Pages

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

The Anatomy of a Trade

Here’s a trade I put on the other day. I thought it might be useful for you to see someone else’s thought process.

First, the best herds were identified by using relative strength to the S&P. I used an analysis of the sector ETFs that most closely resemble the sectors as defined by TD Ameritrade. The relative strength of Coals and Retail were among the best. On the retail end, BKE was one of the stocks with the best performance during a sector pullback. It was therefore selected as having best relative strength. It should be understood that looking at these stocks for performance involves looking over the last 4 weeks. IMHO, looking at last January has little to do with the here and now, so I don’t care what these candidates have done Year-to-date. It’s kind of like a salary review: “Yeah, but what did you do for me yesterday?”.

We want to enter the trade, but we must realize buying BKE is a very high risk trade. Why? The daily chart stochastics are oversold, and the daily chart looks like it is starting to roll over. Therefore the daily trend is likely lower. Here’s the daily chart:

Chart 1


But we wanted to enter the trade because of the structural reasoning of QE2, and the structural reasoning that we are entering the Christmas season, where retail typically outperforms. (BTW, on the chart, the little spikes below the price action candlesticks indicates the volume. Remember that for the following charts. The name gets covered up by that grey window.)


So we waited until we had a pullback on the 60 minute chart. This pullback resulted in a higher low. We entered at that point. If we did not have a higher low, we would not have entered. We made a buy of 200 shares at 34.05. The stochs are below 20, the momentum and ultimate oscillator have started to rise. See the 60 minute chart, and make sure you understand “higher low” and “pullback”. Why did I choose 200 shares? Look at the “bar point range” on the daily chart, and you will see that in a day, the peak range is about $1, so that means I would lose as much as $200 in a trade that went completely wrong. This is within my risk appetite.



The initial buy of 200 shares happened at 34.05. Actually, this is our third higher low, the first one was on 11/03 at a price of $30. Can you pick out the second higher low?


If we don’t get a higher high, that is above 35, we get out. We watch the stochastics, and when they turn south, we look at the price. If it’s lower than 35, we’re out.

We are approaching the end of the day. What do we do? We look at the volume during the last 15 minutes. If the volume is increasing and the price is increasing we will stay in overnight. If the volume is decreasing or disappearing, or if the price action is falling, we will exit overnight and re-enter tomorrow morning. Volume action is the tell; and in my experience the volume action is often continued after hours. Here’s the last 2 minute chart, look at it and tell me what you see:


Do you see the higher lows on each candle, and the increase in volume from 15:36? That shows commitment to the price action. It is a good indicator that there will be follow through Monday morning. We’ll see.

Well, we saw. This Monday morning, the S&P opened higher, around .39. And BKE is on the rise, the 15 minute relative strength is higher than the S&P, and it’s relative strength curve is positive, meaning it’s getting stronger.

Ok what now? Do we add? No. We look for a cycle of stochastics on the 60 minute chart and add if we see a higher low. See on the 60 minute chart how the stochastics are below the 20% line? When we go up to the 80% line, presumably the stock will have risen in price, and when it returns to the 20% line again, we will look for a price above the 33.90 price, the price we were at at 13:30 which was the inflection point.

Where do we set our stop? At the 33.90 point? No. Looking at the chart, where do you see price support? It’s not at the 33.90 point. There’s no volume commitment there whatsoever. So this is likely a false support point. We do have some volume at the 33.70 point on 11/09 at 13:30. That too is near an inflection point where the stocs started to turn around. So maybe we set our stop at just a little below, at 33.63. Always set your stop at an odd point because it’s interesting how turn-arounds happen at even points, like ¾ of a dollar.

Now our risk is defined. We stand to lose (34.05 – 33.63) * 200 or $84. Plus trading fees.

Suppose we get a higher low, or never get the stochastics to drop below the 20 line. Where do we add?

This depends on your risk appetite and how much money you have. I intend to add at the end of the day if BKE is higher and the market is higher. I intend to wait for the stochs to pull back to the 20% point if the market closes lower but BKE is still higher. So we’ll have to wait and see.

Some traders shift to the 15 minute or 10 minute chart to plot their adds. Then they might add on a higher low on that chart, and adjust their stops. They have greater risk appetites than I.

What’s the next point we look for? If the price goes over 35.07 on this 60 minute chart cycle, we have a higher high, and the 3LB will show no turnaround. That means we’ve had a successful entry on this stock and the 3LB is still showing a positive trend.

Well, here’s the chart:

Chart 4


The stochastics are back up at the top 80%, and we don’t have a higher high. We’re out without adding. Sell Price: 34.58.

On this trade, we made (34.58 – 34.05) * 200 – 22 = $84. So we didn’t lose money, but it looks like the supposition we started with that we are likely to see a correction on BKE is correct: no higher high means to stay in the trade is too risky. Let’s see where we would have been had we stayed in:

Chart 5

Because we never got the higher high above 35, the momentum of the uptrend was broken. We stood to lose money on the trade. Getting out was the right choice.

So when a trade does not do as you expect, get out of it. Any loss should be tiny and what you can afford. If the trade does not obey the rules, get out of it. See the big spike? That means somebody with a big wallet is playing, and they’re using your money while you were in the trade. The way a big spike works with such low volume trades is interesting: somebody can see where market orders are set, and knows how to use this knowledge with small buys at the right price points. Spike, and he's out. Usually, that is the stock operator, and he needs work done on his Ferrari.

If I had stayed in, and saw the spike happen this morning, I guarantee I would be out of that trade. I will never again chase or hold on to a spike. More often than not, you’ll end up a loser. See what happened when the market caught up to this spike? But I’ve got my Burger King money on this one, I’ll go get a double whopper maybe tomorrow.

92 comments:

  1. Well, those charts are too big. I'll see if I can get 'em compressed before too many people wake up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, I apologize to everybody. The photobucket application won't let me delete those oversize charts, and although I have shrunken ones, it won't let me substitute the files.

    I will have to look for another picture site. I don't understand, just a couple of days ago, it let me do everything I wanted, but today, nada.

    sorry.

    I'll try this again when I can get my tools in order.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Morning all! Great post Rock! Don't worry about the chart sizes, I'll fix them for you :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rock - Great post and thanks for taking the time to write it up and post it. The big charts are no biggie (Oh how punny)

    Mangy Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  5. For chart sizes we have wee, not so wee, and fargin HUGE!

    ReplyDelete
  6. They look fine, Rock. Don't worry about it!

    Nice post.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rock - fixed most of them for ya - for some reason I can't get chart 1 and 2 to come up. If you could email them to me I can fix those two.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Thor

    I dunno how you did it. Thanks.

    I need to find a new image saver. Photobucket sucks.

    Anyway, I hope nobody was short overnight. "Pop Pop fizz fizz oh what a relief it is...."

    ReplyDelete
  9. Rock,

    Great post. Thanks.

    Not much happening today. I wonder what the trading desks at BAC thinking? - Where they'll take this market to.

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Rock,

    Saw Faber video at moneytalks.net. The interviewer asked him a quetion about younger generation's future. Faber's reply, "Go East Young Man". HongKong, Singapore, China, India etc.

    So, you'r at the right place. LOL

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  11. Great article on the Euro -

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100008667/the-horrible-truth-starts-to-dawn-on-europes-leaders/

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thor - It strikes me as odd that the European leaders are just starting to realize this.

    Here we are a group of people who are not in a possition of leadership, no real economic experience and just trying to live our day to day lives the best that we can. Yet somehow we were able to figure this out months ago.

    Oh well I guess the fact that they are figuring it out now, is better then never...

    Mangy Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  13. Not much of a bounce so far .. .

    ReplyDelete
  14. Thank you eversomuch, Rock for your post. I will take time today to go over it all.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Good one over at TBP:

    http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/11/dear-uncle-sucker/comment-page-1/#comment-448543

    I'm utterly amazed at St. Warren's Op Ed in the Times today. These people are literally living in their own universe, nevermind the planet.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hmmm. I have to change my name back to small caps.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The day after a trend day is usually a consolidation day, especially in the morning time frame. Good day to make small range bound trades.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Denise - not showing anything in my gmail account . . .

    ReplyDelete
  19. Maybe I have the wrong gmail. Send it to me at my yahoo account.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Meanwhile, the slow drip, drip, drip in the housing market continues unabated.

    http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/11/corelogic-house-prices-declined-18-in.html

    ReplyDelete
  21. This is priceless.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/nacas-bruce-marks-goes-postal-jpm-crony-during-yesterdays-fraudclosure-hearing

    ReplyDelete
  22. About the guy who lost it yesterday on JPM Chase in the hearing and was promptly escorted out:

    http://www.naca.com/about_naca/staff/bruceMarks.jsp

    ReplyDelete
  23. This one's for you, Thor. The circus "show" rolls onward in Cali and the U.S. (and world).


    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/18/us/18calif.html?hp

    ReplyDelete
  24. @Manny,

    The pent up anger is going to continue to spill over, especially when a bankster gets in front of congress and lies to them. Is this guy under oath?

    ReplyDelete
  25. @dss: I believe he was, but does it matter anymore?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Bear flag forming on the 60 minute SPY.

    ReplyDelete
  27. No, like the cigarette manufacturers, bankster CEO's, Goldman employees, etc., they know they can lie under oath with impunity, as nothing will ever happen to them.

    Now if you are a baseball player and lie about taking steroids, (you know, one of the most important issues facing America today) you can go to jail.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Manny - yes, that's been in the news here nonstop since the election. I'm very VERY interested to see how Brown handles this, especially with all the new rules on getting a budget passed.

    He has to submit a budget no later than January 7th (plus or minus on the exact date) so we'll know very quickly exactly what kind of Governor he's going to be and where his priorities will be.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Thor: I don't see how there's any way out if it for Cali without a federal bailout of some sort? Of course, that presents all sorts of problems itself, but what's the end game out there? If everyone is willing to play extend and pretend seemingly forever, can this go on for what seems like forever?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Manny - This is key too;

    A $6 billion shortfall in the $126 billion budget passed in October, a record 100 days late.

    These latest budget problems — described by officials in both parties as calamitous — confirm what many officials warned when the Legislature voted in October: the gap was closed, in no small part, through the use of budget gimmickry, including overly optimistic estimates of federal revenue.


    It's almost as if CA if like the rest of the country(world) on fast forward with regard to playing with the budget numbers and kicking the can.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Manny - Yeah, a lot of people are talking about that now, I replied to MBLardes over at TBP about the same topic. Constitutionally, there are a lot things that would have to be basically abandoned in the state before we defaulted on our debts. Only education comes before debt payments. They would have to cut all aid to cities, all state employees would be furloughed, or their salaries cut (a move that The Governator made last year and has since been upheld by our Supreme Court), hospitals, prisons, etc before we defaulted on our debt. Our constitution is very clear on this, and contrary to MBLardes suggestion that we would just amend our constitution so that we could default is silly. It would not only take well over a year to do so, but I doubt very much if it would pass given the nightmare it would create in state budgets being unable to issue any bonds, investors would walk away forever if we default wouldn't they?

    ReplyDelete
  32. @Thor: Good point, but forever is a long time. Memories are short. Didn't the city of NYC default back in the mid-70's?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Bottom line - I DO think a default is a real possibility, I just don't think it's going to happen in the timeline everyone talks about. There is this MSM obsessive fear mongering every time we have a budget issue in the state, but in reality, there are other states in just as bad shape as we are that do not get the constant attention because their economies are not equal to the size of France's.

    I don't personally think a default is going to come out of nowhere if it happens, there will be many many other things that happen first - the most visible one would be the inability of the governor and legislatures to come to an agreement on cuts.

    Remember, it only takes a simple majority here now to pass a budget - we'll see very soon whether or not those propositions we passed earlier this month are going to do anything for our financial prospects :-/

    ReplyDelete
  34. Thor - They may be on fast forward, but how they go so will the rest of the states, therefore the country.

    If CA has the 4th largest economy in the world, it will make things all the more real.

    If CA gets a fedral bailout, how many states will be lining up behind them?

    If CA makes drastic cuts or has to issue IOU's how many states will be lining up behind them?

    If CA can not show it can be self sufficient and provide services (Which it can not) then it will make it easier for other states to follow suit.

    because of the severity of it, I think TPTB will try and do a backdoor baitout, but once it gets out to the public, it wont go well.

    Oh boy I can not wait until next summer, when the prisons need to let inmates out and police have to lay officers off and petty crimes are simply not prosicuted.

    Fewer fire fighers and less social progams to keep people safe. But at least CA leagized mj so every on will be stoned and not care.... Oh wait, it's still illegal.

    mangy Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  35. @Mutt: Makes me glad I don't live in Cali, among other reasons. I can deal with a little bad weather.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Great points, James. Illinois is next. We already have many of the same problems but on a smaller scale.

    ReplyDelete
  37. James - Very good points! Remember though, that the GOP won big this month. I don't think they'll ever be able to get a bailout for CA through congress. Certainly not through the house, not CA, that godless, socialists, paradise full of homo's an elites. Noway, we don't wan't to enable the liberal agenda

    ReplyDelete
  38. Thor - Good point, I did not think about that.

    It will be intersting to see how things play out for you guys all I know is there is no good answer.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  39. Politicians helped bring Chicago's public pension funds to the brink of insolvency

    "Inadequate contributions, underperforming investments have also jeopardized the retirement of tens of thousands of city workers and put taxpayers on the hook for billions of dollars"

    "Time and again, the funds have been used as a bargaining chip or a piggy bank. Politicians trimmed budgets by offering early retirement incentives and greased union contract deals with increases in benefits. "Pension holidays" allowed the city to avoid paying into workers' retirement funds.

    As a result, the funds soon may not be able to keep promises that are codified in the state constitution, threatening the retirements of tens of thousands of rank-and-file union members and leaving taxpayers on the hook for billions of dollars owed to teachers, police officers, firefighters and others."

    ReplyDelete
  40. @dss: I guess the "sanctity of contracts" meme only holds water for the uber wealthy and powerful, but we knew that already.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Manny - no shit. TC over at TBP is working my last nerve with the dismissiveness of fraudcloser. I'll be you 20 bucks he was one of those people screaming about the sanctity of contracts during the GM bankruptcy. Now that it's his own industry on the hook he's singing another tune.

    ReplyDelete
  42. We are headed for a YOYO economy. Everyone for themselves will be the new rallying cry.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Of course this is the very same person who not two months ago made the comment that only the unintelligent resort to ad hominum attacks only to continuously call people who don't agree with him names.

    Hypocrisy everywhere you look today. It's depressing.

    ReplyDelete
  44. David Rosenberg - We will likely see S&P 1000.

    "David Rosenberg: As speculators withdraw, the market bears awaken".

    www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/

    "Over the next few months I expect the S&P to trade down to around 1000, the low end of the 14 nonth range. I also expect a falloff in commodity prices, although I remain bullish for the long run in this area. ....". 10 yr. bonds are ripe for a rally, gap between 5-10 year treasuries yields.

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  45. Things get surrealer and surrealer by the minute.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/nobel-peace-prize-recipient-award-buffet-medal-freedom-most-successful-circle-jerk-execution

    ReplyDelete
  46. U.S. still tracking Japan in the '90s?

    http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/11/inflation-core-cpi-median-cpi-16.html

    ReplyDelete
  47. It's interesting that both EPI (India) and ECNS (China) are underperforming the S&P. Whod'a thought?

    But ENZL (New Zealand) is doing quite nicely. I guess they sprayed the kiwis and everything looks great there.

    China and India really took the pipe, didn't they? Underperforming the S&P by .04 or so. Maybe some of that QE2 money will be spent in the US? Naw. Wishful thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  48. @Thor,

    You have to consider the source and move on. It's not as if you had any respect for that person much less their "opinions" anyway? It's like getting mad at Bozo the Clown because he has a red nose and acts stupid.

    We already know that drill. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  49. Looks like we are coming out of the downside of the bear flag that formed today.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Still holding above yesterday's lows so far. Fresh tick and momentum lows point to more downside.

    ReplyDelete
  51. This is a very anemic bounce after yesterday and the market makers are having to support the new GM stock issue.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Denise - Hah, that's very true! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  53. See the nice higher lows and higher highs on the VXX?

    ReplyDelete
  54. I put it on at 47.83. Just my usual entry, with a stop at 46.92. Again, if I don't see a higher high, I'll just get out and watch. I like it when I get higher highs and higher lows when I start long.

    Maybe I get another double whopper....

    ReplyDelete
  55. Nice trade, Rock. I think that they are trying to defend that 118.00 SPY level as long as they can. Doesn't it seem like there has been a change of character? (constant underlying buy program turned off for a while)

    ReplyDelete
  56. Denise - I took my 5% to play another day. I think I will see if I can find a place to sit next to Rock at BK.

    I am set up to make another move and probably will this week.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  57. @Mutt,

    Some days it is all about the lunch money. Be proud that you made a good trade and actually rang the cash register.

    ReplyDelete
  58. @Mutt,

    The real key is to consistently make winning trades which is a huge goal.

    Be very patient as the key to making money is in consistency; once you are consistent you can increase your size. That is the biggest mistake that inexperienced traders make, trading too big or using levered products. Always trade at the smallest size and use no leverage until you are consistently profitable.

    ReplyDelete
  59. @Mutt

    Ditto to what Dss said.

    Patience, padawan, patience......

    ReplyDelete
  60. Denise - Thanks, I am happy with the trade. I could have gotten in a little earlier and out a little later, but all that would have gotten me was a supersized fries (No I am NOT sharing Rock)

    Although I have been guilty of jumping in with both feet and doing it too soon, I have never made and doubt I ever will make a levered trade. There is no such thing as a sure thing and even if I can afford to loose that money I don't want to. Slow and steady is ok with me.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Mutt,

    There are so many levered ETF's and I have seen a lot of folks get creamed because of them. When you are right the money is great, but when you are wrong it can kill your trading account.

    The key is to stay in the game and try not to lose too much while learning. :-0

    ReplyDelete
  62. Bet we get a nice bounce tomorrow off the GM IPO

    ReplyDelete
  63. None of the market makers, and buyers, including the government, want the market to be tanking tomorrow when the GM IPO starts officially trading.

    ReplyDelete
  64. This is priceless from TPB:

    Can You Spell Felony?

    As to the grammatical error: Forgery, fraud, and criminal contempt of court are not mere “questionable practices” — the word you are having some difficulty recalling is Felony. If the editors at Washington Post do not know how to spell the word, perhaps we can help them out:

    The word is Felony.

    Spelling bee contestant: “Can you use that in a sentence?”

    Yes: “Felony. The bank executive was convicted of a felony involving fraud, went to prison, and was sodomized daily. Felony”

    Felony. F-E-L-O-N-Y.

    Congratulations, you spelled the word correctly.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Citi bank.

    Did they just have flash crash, and up. I was looking at marketwatch.com.

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  66. GM IPO Biggest in History, 6 times over subscribed

    Including proceeds from the preferred offering, and money from underwriters exercising over-allotment options, the IPO sets a new record that even surpasses the $22.1 billion IPO earlier this year by Agricultural Bank of China.

    “The biggest IPO worldwide is momentous,” said analyst Scott Sweet of research firm IPO Boutique. “The demand is massive,” with the offering roughly six times oversubscribed, he added.

    Funds raised in the common stock sale are going to GM’s current owners, including the government and the United Auto Workers Union. The new GM will be roughly 26% owned by the Treasury Department, down from 61% before the IPO.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Good article on MW about the tarnishing of Warren Buffet:

    The Tarnishing of Warren Buffet

    It was in 2003 that Buffett made his now legendary assessment of the derivatives market: Wall Street's $1.5 quadrillion unregulated, private casino. Said Buffett, the derivatives market posed "a mega-catastrophic risk" to the entire U.S. economy, as it was filled with "financial weapons of mass destruction."

    Buffett went on to add "derivatives generate reported earnings that are often wildly overstated and based on estimates whose inaccuracy may not be exposed [emphasis mine] for many years." Translation: the derivatives market was a cesspool for fraud. He further stated that the creators of some of these derivatives were "madmen."

    Flash-forward seven years, and now the only time Buffett chooses to talk about the derivatives market is when he is announcing yet more losses on his derivatives "investments." The same Warren Buffett who warned people away from these "financial weapons of mass destruction," in a fraud-filled market created by "madmen" couldn't resist the urge to gamble in Wall Street's crooked casino -- with shareholder dollars.

    ReplyDelete
  68. @Denise,

    It's not there anymore. I was checking the AH market and saw citi drop to $3.75 area, checked the chart and back. It quickly came back up and not showing now. Weird.

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  69. Cobra's Market View - http://cobrasmarketview.blogspot.com/

    Some good charts lately. Just reads the tape and no articles etc.

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  70. Must have been a bad print.

    I Can, do you have gmail account?

    ReplyDelete
  71. I love this wording.

    "That the Irish economy has seen better days is not under debate. The Irish banking system is in extreme distress with the Irish government fearing that it may need to inject another 20 billion euros ($27 billion) on top of the 60 billion euros it has already used to recapitalize the sector"

    Recapitalize? Why that word? Why not call a bailout a bailout? Why is it referred to as a bailout when talking about the Irish Economy, but when we're talking about the banks, it's "recapitalized"?

    ReplyDelete
  72. Ireland is such a tiny country. 87 billion euros is SO MUCH MONEY per capita for them.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Thor,

    Also it seems that not only are multinational corporations seeking the cheapest labor inputs they are seeking the cheapest corporate tax rates, too, which Ireland is one of the cheapest in Europe.

    ReplyDelete
  74. this is a very funny YouTube:

    QE2

    Hat tip to TBP's Calvin Jones

    ReplyDelete
  75. "Including proceeds from the preferred offering, and money from underwriters exercising over-allotment options, the IPO sets a new record that even surpasses the $22.1 billion IPO earlier this year by Agricultural Bank of China."

    USA! USA! USA!

    ReplyDelete
  76. Isn't it also true the GM has ZERO debt obligation now? And much more favorable labor conditions? Toyota is still trying to repair it's image, the Volt is apparently more popular than they'd thought. What are they going to do with all that money? That puts them at an huge advantage in this market place doesn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  77. Asia up hard - Futures up 63. Hello GM!

    ReplyDelete
  78. @ICan:

    RE CITI: there was a huge sell at 13:01 of 5 Million shares. Open: 4.18, close 4.175 with a range of 4.17 to 4.19.

    At 13:11, there was huge buy of 5 million shares. Open, 4.175, close 4.185 with a range of 4.17-4.19.

    THEN there was another 3.6 million share sell at 13:16, Open: 4.185, close 4.18 with a range of 4.18-4.19.

    See what happened? Somebody saw market buy orders creeping up so sold 5 million, the buy orders came in then bought back 5 million a few minutes later, then when the market buy orders were automatically moved up, sold 3 million shares at$.02 higher.

    It's called market manipulation, people do it because they have the capital. Same exact thing happened in BKE earlier this week as I was following it (see my post)

    It's how the big guys capture Grammy's money.

    If you want to see the sincerety of a move, look for the volume shortly after to see if there is "follow through" or if the move is simply somebody trying to manipulate the market.

    I suspect these kinds of manipulations make money, and in the case of C, it allowed somebody to get 3 million shares out without losing money, in fact by making money.

    Who says this market is not manipulated? That's exactly why I screen for daily volumes of over 250 million in a stock.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Markets applaud Ireland for accepting our money (money that we don't have anyway), in order to implement austerity measures that won't work!

    hurray!
    ..now let's get back to our correction business, shall we?

    ReplyDelete
  80. Well, we've finally figured out how to lower the housing inventory.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-18/rust-belt-cities-demolish-homes-as-foreclosures-blight-cleveland-detroit.html

    Can you spell "w-r-e-c-k-i-n-g-b-a-l-l"?

    I think they ought to let the fire department have practice, or at least have a weenie roast. Maybe Carter's weenie?

    ReplyDelete
  81. @MAnnwich:

    I know, I'm full of "bull".

    I think correction's over. Fundamentals are improving (my traffic observation, Dss' mall occupancy observation (isn't that soooo Male/Female? Rock drives his car, Dss shops....)), jobs are improving, housing inventory is going down (see the above), it's Christmas so be sure you go by TIF's to pick up your admin's appreciation notification.

    Life is getting better. Let's go with the flow. GM's IPO is 6X oversubscribed (they're better than Treasuries, for goodness sakes).

    Up, up, and away, in my etc etc.

    Now the big question I see is as the Euro is slowly undermined, will the cash flow into Bucky *and* our stock market, or just into Bucky. I'm betting it will flow into both because of different risk appetites, and I'm betting we will see both the market, and Bucky improve (or at least, Bucky stabilize and the European bankers fund the Fed's buyback of the treasure-ees. Or Treasure-ease.

    Let's go with the flow. Back into SKS, TIF, MEE, etc. Look at PCX this morning.

    ReplyDelete
  82. New thread! Sorry about that, I had the damn thing scheduled for 4PM on accident!

    ReplyDelete