Pages

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

End of Day Volume Analysis

This post is the first of a series on volumes. This example uses the SPY which is lightly traded in the afterhours, so anyone with a big pocketbook and perhaps access to 0% interest can move the market then. Let’s see what happened last Thursday night/Friday morning.

I posted a comment that I thought there would be a pop on Friday morning. Here’s why: First, the chart



We should know that the trend was up from around 14:35. Remember the trend is your friend. Second, on the chart, we see some heavy volume at around 15:48 continuing into the close (Thursday afternoon). You can see the volume approaches 0 during the after hours. The biggest number I see in the aftermarket trading is around 8000 per 3 minute bar timeframe. So small, you can’t see it on the “volume” part of the chart. I put the cursor at the last tick of the evening, and you can see the volume there is 100 shares, in the grey window next to “volume”.

So at the 8:00 AM open, you see the gap. The extended hours opening 3-minute volume is 255854 shares, and it’s that small green bump you see on the volume line next to the red vertical (cursor) line. How did the price go from 133.30 at 18:27 to 133.93 at 8:00 AM the next day with no one around? Remember the buyers are typically below the current price, and the sellers are typically above. This price gap means that there were 255854 sellers that decided to move their price upwards from the 133.30 range to the 133.90 range. The buyers were committed to move in the same direction.

It may also be that the sellers didn’t move, but that the volume below the 133.90 range was quickly exhausted. But we can see by the shape of the price bar that that did not happen. Because the price bar closed lower than it opened (it’s red), that means that sellers had to move downwards after the open. Because the price bar range is below the close, that’s the volume that was bought/sold after the open. The open price was 133.93, and that’s where the first transaction of the day started.

Therefore, all sellers moved their price above 133.93, except for the one block that was sold at that value. So, sellers retreated, and buyers advanced their prices before 8:00.

Where did those buyers’ 200K shares come from? It didn’t seem to be there during the after hours trading the evening before, so it was probably new blocks. Notice the trading around 4:30 on Thursday. Lots of volume. I believe the new stock came from this volume, and from these trades come the 200K shares that appeared for the 8:00 AM open. (this is significant for what comes later).

Now, look at the 9:30 candle. During the first 3 minutes, the range was 133.99 to 133.82. You’ve read about the “opening range”, so looking at these trades, these 3 million shares that sellers moved down to sell, and buyers moved up to buy, define the “opening range”. The next 3 minutes, you see that the close was lower than the open, but the volume was cut in half. The price range during that time was within the opening 3 minutes’ range. The next 3 minutes, the close was equal to the open, and again the volume was about ½ the open volume. But the next price candle, the open was just below the high. But look at the volume, the volume went up to almost 3 million. The price closed below the opening range, so this is an opening range breakdown. Or ORB. If you see ORB in print, you have to check if it’s a “breakdown” or “breakout”. Both can be ORB.

Adding up the volume at the end of the day on Thursday, for the last 18 minutes of trading, somebody exchanged around 15 million shares. And the average for that time period looks like around 6.7 million. So somebody ended up with an extra 7 million shares, at or around 133.40. These people may have adusted their buy/sell orders for only 3.5 million shares (defining the opening range). They may have supplied their own shares to buy them back, defining the range, then started dumping. You can see the price capitulation happen after the 9:39 candle, and the high volume continued until the price returned to the 133.40 value which was Thursday evening’s close.

The effect? Somebody bought low, popped the stock using their own shares, dumped at a higher price, and gave up selling or had sold them all when the price returned to their entry point. How can this be done now? Well, the volume in the market is extremely low, so a ½ Billion$ can move mountains.

So, in conclusion, look at the volume plays at the end of the day. If there’s heavy volume and the trend is up, and then light volume in the aftermarket (usual case), look for a gap up at the early market open, and if there’s light enough volume, or the owners of the heavy volume buy at the end of the day sacrifice enough stock, you’ll see the pop at the open.

The strategy is to sell into the gaps, usually gaps fill. This volume analysis shows you why, and how the people with the big pocketbooks can make the big bucks on creating their own opening snapper.

53 comments:

  1. Rock,

    Thanks for the analysis. Always interesting to see another's analysis.

    With regard to gaps up/down in the SPY the odds are that they will fill if they are less than 1.00, 132.10 minus 131.10, but if they are more than 1 point then the odds are they will not fill.

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Dss

    That's good input.

    Yesterday, some buying at the end of the day, but not much more than usual, and the same is true this morning, some volume, but not much more than usual.

    So with no confirming volume coming in, the gap filled again.

    And, the gap was less than a point. So with no big movement volume the evening before, and less than a point gap, it may make sense to make that a play.

    Actually, I bought a little SDS this morning, and I'm selling it now so I guess I can have dinner out tomorrow night.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rock,

    It was Corey from Afraid to Trade to made those observations so I am just passing them along. Not sure he ever put a volume filter on it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. @Dss
    That was about $.16.

    Maybe lunch tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rock - Thank you for taking out the scalpel and performing surgery on Volume Analysis for us.

    Believe it or not I understood most of the big parts, even after you opened the thing up. And I comprehended your explanation on how these things fit and work together, but just did not quite grasp all the inner workings yet...But getting there.

    Thank you for sharing your insight.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Mannwich:

    From yesterday's tirade toward the Fed, I'm sorry to say it, but all this effort of opening up the books and looking at what's in the basement, really is a waste of time.

    Not that I would try to prove that thesis, it's just that by law, we cannot put Ben in jail, or any of his people, and we cannot put Tim in jail, or any of his people, no matter how outrageous the misuse was. In the law, it states that except for capital offense, they are immune from prosecution in the administration of TARP, which includes TALF, as it was a derivative of TARP.

    Rest assured, our men and women in Washington knew when the law was passed that an unsupervised, uncontrolled license to print money would cause egregious misuse, and it was obvious to me when the amendment which protected Bernank from prosecution, there would be no one ever held accountable for that misuse. And, for sure, everyone who worked for Bernank knew this as well (there would be no way Bernank would blame one of his underlings for giving a couple of whores 1/4 billion for their services, so they were safe).

    We as a people simply need to find representatives that won't back down and face disaster. And representatives who will remember who is a liar, and that a tiger cannot change his stripes. And that the next tiger has stripes, too.

    And actually, that hasn't changed since the 1900's. So maybe we should just accept government as it is and let it go.

    I had to look up egregious. I don't think I ever used that word before.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Rock: I think we've been "accepting government" as it is for a long, long time now, which has led us to this point whereby they and their friends in high places continue to do egregious things, and now right out in the open. At some point, the buck will stop, but it will probably take a while before anything happens to reverse it. I honestly think that just letting it go is a slippery slope. Where will that lead us in the end? Do we just hope that we're long gone by then and let our kids deal with the messes that we've made by commission AND omission?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Speaking of corruption, Mu and sons being detained by Egyptian authories. Could take years to ascertain all of the corruption that occurred under his watch, I'm guessing.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/world/middleeast/14egypt.html?hp

    ReplyDelete
  9. And another thing on that topic - my main point isn't whether we can stop all of this corruption. We clearly can't, but what we CAN do is vote to tax the shit out of these people and their ill-gotten gains, and thereby take at least SOME of the money back so that the little people don't have to take it on BOTH ends as a result of this corruption.

    ReplyDelete
  10. But with buffoons like Boehner and the GOP running around claiming that any/all tax increases are "off the table" under any circumstance, and a weak Obama & Dem party not countering with any substance or strength, putting up a Potemkim token defense (shocker there, since most of them are multi-millionaires too), we know the charade will continue until the people at the true grass roots level wake the eff up and force it to happen. By then it could be too late, however.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm very very curious to hear what Obama will come up with, and whether or not he'll be able to get out in front of this new budget cutting train.

    If anything, the next several months are going to be over the top in news and events. I wonder how much of that, if any, is going to translate into choppy markets.

    ReplyDelete
  12. We have given back all of the gain so far.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Rock (10:52) - Sadly I agree with you.

    However I believe the days of finding honest, hard working people with integrity who care enuff to represent us as a people and a nation are behind us.

    Because there was so much complicacy along the way, it is hard to lay all this at the feet of Ben, Tim, Greenspan. But what they have done should be counted as criminal it should be counted as treasonous as they have helped to gut our country from the inside out. They have created a system, where it is perceived that the only way to get ahead is to borrow money and this has allowed blatant fraud to take place in plain site.

    And when the end of the game was closing in for those who perpetrated the greatest amount of fraud, Ben printed money (Counterfeited) to save them.

    Anyone with an ounce of common sense should know there is no perfect system – Regardless if we are talking about the business of running a house hold all the way to running a country, fraud, theft and greed is and always will be in any aspect of business. So in order to make things as “fair” as possible for all involved we need systems of checks and balances.

    And regardless if the system of checks and balances is as simple as trust and mutual respect, or a system of business rules and codes of conduct, if those regulatory checks and balances becomes too tight, it will begin to choke and that business will eventually die.

    However if the system of checks and balances are to loose, then that business will start to engorge it’s self and gluttony and greed will take over as it eats everything in sight and there will never be enuff to fill the appetite of greed.

    Unfortunately I believe because over the past 30+ years the checks and balances have become way too loose, a table for greed has been set and no matter how much integrity a person has before they sit down to eat most will eventually join the party and start over eating.

    And those not invited are waiting for the crumbs to fall on the floor.

    Oh well there is not much I can do about that….Hey look – Is that a french fry on the floor.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  14. Did you notice how I did not use "egregious" in a sentence...Even AFTER I looked it up.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  15. Mutt - your first sentence is what really worries me about our society. Do we even have any competent, honest, hard working, people willing to go into politics anymore?

    Egregious is one of my favorite words - I use it at work all the time to describe senior staff technology requests :-P

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Mutt

    Thanks. I think we're just trying to collectively itemize and describe considerations that help the probability of a trade to make money.

    I think, when I have time, I'll put together a list of the items to check off before a trade.

    Of course, any trade may be entered, and it is a good trade, as long as we understand the reasons for the trade. If I choose to ignore the checklist items, at the end of the trade, I look back and understand if ignoring those considerations was good and valid, or bad and a mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Dss

    I don't know how your internals are doing, but the Stockcharts.com 3LB for the number of stocks trading above their 50 Day MA is in a clear reversal (down).

    The last time this happened, it preceeded the SPY dip to 127 on 3/16.

    The other thing is I don't like the look of it, it looks like my "M" formation with the right-side lower high, and the right side lower low as well.

    It looks a lot like the shapes before the 2008 capitulation, with the lower highs and lower lows.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Say what you will about this man - he is an excellent speaker.

    I just wish he would f*****g FIGHT for what he believes in. Especially about tax cuts for wealthy people, the nation is on his side with this, all he has to do is LEAD.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I think I see the plan here in this speech. Propose as many things that as many Americans will support (tax increases for the wealthy, closing of corporate tax loopholes, and removing itemized deductions for the rich) and watch the Republican's fight it tooth and nail and lose more support from the public as they see them try to stop changes that they would like to see made.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Rock,

    Internals have been mixed. It would not surprise me to see a relief rally of a few days happen.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thor,

    He is not a fighter, except for the status quo. He is a folder, not a fighter. Compromiser in chief, except that we make all of the compromises and the GOP gets to wipe the floor with the American people, once again.

    Just rolling back the tax cuts to the Clinton era would wipe out massive parts of the debt.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Taxing social security up to the earnings limit, like medicare is all that is needed to make it solvent, forever.

    But then their base would have to pay more taxes and that is just not acceptable. We need to make sure that those poor kids don't get any government freebies, like food, education and health care. The need for personal responsibility is obvious because they are all moochers, and welfare cheats looking for handouts.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Haven't the rich suffered enough?

    ReplyDelete
  24. "I will preserve these health care programs as a promise we make to each other in this society," Obama said in his speech. "I will not allow Medicare to become a voucher program that leaves seniors at the mercy of the insurance industry, with a shrinking benefit to pay for rising costs."

    I hope this is one promise he keeps, unlike many of his campaign promises. Even when the GOP hands the Democrats red meat on a silver platter, the Democrats find some way to muck it up.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Well the market is underwhelmed by the speech.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Thor,

    It is because no one believes in what Obama says anymore and everyone knows that the GOP is bat shit crazy to a person.

    I sure don't trust anyone but Bernie Sanders, to tell the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  27. This country has moved so far to the extreme right that the John Birchers look sane.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I don't as well - they're all crooks. So wish we had a viable third party in this country. Call them The Rational Party or The Pragmatists.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Not on everything though Denise - Culturally we've come quite a ways left. As far to the right as we've been dragged, it is clear now that for the most part, the Social Conservatives have lost, they will not be able to influence the kids coming of age today.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Thor,

    It might have made a difference years ago, but both parties are captive to the uber wealthy in this country and a third party would probably allow it's self to be corrupted as well.

    Remember, we thought that Obama was going to stand up to lobbyists, special interests, etc. instead, they are now in his administration.

    ReplyDelete
  31. In some aspects, we have come further to the left but we are still fighting the same old culture wars, abortion, planned parenthood, guns, etc.

    The kids of today will be the saving grace, as they are coming of age in a much more multicultural international world.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Denise - I think so too. A generation born in fire, I hope they rise to the occasion!

    ReplyDelete
  33. Well we didn't have any volume at all at the end of this session.

    VIX off by 1.40%. No movement, no volume. Obama came on and said we're cutting spending and will raise taxes, and still the market was even, and no volume.

    Right now, I'm thinking we won't see any pop tomorrow morning.

    ReplyDelete
  34. What? no relief rally today? Come on, don't tell me we couldn't even find one dubious reason to celebrate the recovery ?

    There always is a good reason ...

    ReplyDelete
  35. And thanks Rock. No time to go through your lesson (again). I'll have to spare a good hour someday and catch up with the posts and comments from the last 2 weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Lost several hours today, after I decided I could grant me a 1 hour break, to check another Linux distribution on my box: openSuse with KDE4.6 and its "Plasma" stuff. (well that was not exactly a "break", since I hadn't started working yet..*kof kof*)

    So, once I was done with the installation, I quickly found out that some of the features I need most didn't work.

    I therefore decided to jump back to my main OS (Fedora), and that's when I realized that the GRUB bootloader created during the installation didn't see my Fedora partition..

    ReplyDelete
  37. Alright. I guess most of you aren't interested in my little OS misfortunes,so,to make a long story short: well that's the whole point actually. There's no short story when you start messing with software.

    ReplyDelete
  38. And I know I should have checked through the LiveCD to see if openSUSE fitted my needs, before installing it to my hard drive. Oh well.. I guess I'm just that kind of guy.

    Reminds me of how I jumped head first into trading real money before learning what trading meant. Sometimes it works though..

    ReplyDelete
  39. "PIMCO Opens First Emerging Market Fund in Gordon's Stock Push". noir.bloomberg.com

    "Investors dive back into emerging markets'. financialpost.com

    "PIMCO and Van Eck have launced funds dedicated to the asset class in the past few months'.They attractive risk/ reward trade-off versus the U.S. assets.

    "We believe many investors are under allocated to emerging markets. said Misha Gordon a portfolio manager in PIMCO's London office".

    Mutual Funds are getting ready to fleece sheeple in India too. I provided a link there. PIMCO hired Neel Kashkari from Goldman( Neel CashCurry).

    Isn't PiMCO late to the game? How many EM mutual funds are there?

    ICan

    ReplyDelete
  40. From ft.com

    "Chines Equities recover to lead region".

    "Indian investors take a shine to silver".

    "People are going crazy for silver..".

    We talked about that here at the end of Dec 2010. People in Asia are infected with bubble mania. First it was property(which is waaaaaaaaaaaay up there), then gold and now silver.

    ICan

    ReplyDelete
  41. From Zerohedge.com

    Libya: All About Oil, or All About Banking?

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/libya-all-about-oil-or-all-about-banking

    ReplyDelete
  42. Wolfie - Hah, you poor thing. Do you code? I've never had an aptitude for programming, I'm much more a support and administration kinda IT guy.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Wolfie,

    It is all greek to me!

    ReplyDelete
  44. Dan - where have you been? We miss you! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  45. Quote coming through on Facebook - Manny this is for you

    Remember when teachers, public employees, Planned Parenthood, NPR and PBS crashed the stock market, wiped out half of our 401Ks, took trillions in TARP money, spilled oil in the Gulf of Mexico, gave themselves billions in bonuses, and paid no taxes? Yeah, me neither. Pass it on!

    ReplyDelete
  46. Think about that for a second. We have rewarded the people who brought this country to it's knees and continue to rape it each and every day, while at the same time vilifying the people who teach our children, pick up our trash, police our streets, and put out our fires.

    Way to go USA!

    ReplyDelete
  47. Thor,

    Cleaning the beer off of my screen and putting my pistol away for the night.

    ReplyDelete
  48. @ICan,

    Funny how they start new funds after the market is up 100% and two years into the rally.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Oklahoma Anti-Sharia Efforts Thwarted Again As Bill Dies In State Senate

    Thank goodness, now we can move forward with our plans of total world domination. It's us gays and the Muslims, we're coming to steal your children. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  50. Denise - nice show tonight ;-)

    ReplyDelete