Pages

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Crossroads

Hello everybody.

When I mentioned early in September what the market could do I made April-May the first important challenge that the equity market could or could not face, and we are here.

I'm trying to optimize the use of time (work constrains)that I get, to study the markets as a whole first and then re-engage in my silly accuracy rate predictions in individual stocks, (they are coming anyway).

But I need to get a clear idea of what the market can do because in a huge drop 80-90% of individual stocks get dragged in the general movement. When I'll be able to pick stocks successfully withouth paying attention to the general market...well, that would be the moment that I can say to myself after years and years of efforts you did it dude, but I'm not there.In the meantime I need to get help from the general market and/or improved synaptic activity.

And the general market is in a crossroad after 7 months and something. Meaning that what happens set the trend for several months or even more.

The market looks weak even though it didn't loose it's mojo.It sits around 1% from the top for more than a week after the Feb correction.Now started coming down a little without impulsiveness.

This behaviour could be seen as a plateau because of exhaustion but doesn't square too much with the fact that easily and rapidly erased the Feb correction.At that point did have lots of energy and then what? just to sit there looking pretty.

That doesn't look too weak, when push came to shove it recovered and now is playing with the idea of a doble top for everyone to see and begun dropping in slow motion, to give the impression to bearish players that they are lucky to jump in, because of the slow motion. That makes me suspicious.

My original view back in September was that will move up at a good pace till April May and then an important correction but the good pace stopped in Feb it's almost two months going nowhere but sitting at the very top without breaking it.
And we got already the doble top and what I'm struggling with is the fact that timewise is too early.

Had the double top come by the end of April early May I wouldn't have too many objections to the idea of a big down straight movement.

Now I'm more of expecting a drop that starts accelerating, stops reverse somewhat but not reaching the top; then drop but lower than from the point where it started rebounding, and drops some more.After that stalls at the bottom of the drop, test the area a few times and two weeks had passed and we are at the end of the month. :)

If it happens that way (a downhill movement with a hump in the middle) we have more bull to come.

The less favoured view being a distant second is that April 7 is the last top but for that being the case it cannot stop the drop for a nice rebound at least until the 28th or 29th of April; then a desperate attemp to reach the top again that fails, making a lower high, and a drop from there about 12-15%. This should be really simple to follow but I doubt that could play like that, we will need some panic and I'm not too convinced that people can be caught by surprise that easy today, the environment is not rosy.

And regarding where we are sitting by the end of the month we can see important chances of a big reversal to what we experience this two weeks.

All in all the end of April early May is still my line in the sand for something important.Will see what happens.

Dan

62 comments:

  1. Thanks Dan, good detailed insight that you're sharing there :)

    I don't have much conviction either way. Playing very short term and tight stops in my virtual portfolio.

    As mentioned before, the 1312 mark still stands as important support in my mind. Until it's taken, I won't waste time doing additional analysis for possible downside scenarios (next support 1303, then 1294 ...).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice post, Dan. This seems like a slo-mo top, but if the top is in we will know in the weeks ahead.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also, "in a huge drop 80-90% of individual stocks get dragged in the general movement."

    Hard to quantify, I think it really depends on the nature of the global meltdown (how long it lasts, how many big down days and with what volume...)

    Generally though, I would tend to think that the percentage of affected stocks is significantly superior than that.

    In a sustained sell-off, aka "panic", I'd even guess it's a matter of days before we get close to 100% of the stocks being dragged with the markets.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My tiny short has a tiny profit!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Once again XLV and XLP are up on the day as well. Safety stocks.

    XLE is down 2.50%. Who was left to buy?

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Mannwich top is in folks. Lol.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hope that Pimco has their bond shorts hedged.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Manny,

    You just might be right!

    Did you see the gap up in TLT?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Too many storms are-a-swirlin'. Or swans. Reality doesn't bite. Until it does.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Gap down in the S&P's and huge volume this morning.

    ReplyDelete
  11. DXY, and risk assets all down? Even the U$D down?


    What's up?


    ICan

    ReplyDelete
  12. @Dastro

    I already got it. I love pullbacks. It's the only way we can identify the strongest stocks when the market trend is up.

    So let's trade this pullback until the hints tell us we've turned around back in the direction the Fed wants, and buy long the stocks that pulled back the least.

    I'm sorry to see that AAPL won't be one of the strongest stocks. Their relative strength compared to the s&P has been -2% or more.

    We'll have to look at Dss' list of winners, I havent had time to take a look into her winning sectors, but that maybe could be today.

    Rock's been told he has to go on another trip, but it's been really tired in here. I passed out about 3:00 last nite, and wasn't able to tell DSS to keep her shorts on, regardless of the crushed velvet seats, ridin' in the back, oozin down the Street.

    Anyway,l I think the more participation we get here, the better.

    And after reading all the articles, it seems "oozin down the Street" is a pretty good analogy.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Am out and about right now but lurking. Have accumulated a decent tlt position lately so I like the sound of "gap up" right now.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I don't want to sound too negative, but I'm very skeptical that there is such a method that you're seeking.

    I find it hard to imagine a trading system that would enable you to trade in a context isolated from the global markets. At least not one that will consistently isolate you from all market setups.

    The closer to that may be the kind of dull market we've been seeing these last 3 weeks. No major move, little impact on the "natural" development of individual stocks. At least I appreciate the current setup.;)

    ReplyDelete
  15. I too am putting on the "away" flag. Trade safe everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Dollar down on bond strength, (rate weakness).

    ReplyDelete
  17. S&P500 50dma 1314 Key support level.


    ICan

    ReplyDelete
  18. How's that austerity thing working outvon the UK? Not so well, it seems.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/uk-inflation-plunges-retail-sales-drop-most-record

    ReplyDelete
  19. Morning folks. Cheapest gas on my way in to work - $4.21

    ReplyDelete
  20. dss(10:10)

    Thanks. BOC also chose to stay put on rate hike today.

    ICan

    ReplyDelete
  21. Looking to add to my short on any decent rally.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @dss,


    On Lumber - saw a seasonality chart. It was on the blog - timingthemarket - see Monday's tech talk. Lumber goes down hill from here until Oct? All the lumber has been bought in Feb/Mar.

    ICan

    ReplyDelete
  23. The US is finishing up the $600b QE. Did they stop buying stocks?

    ReplyDelete
  24. ICan,

    Thanks. That site is really terrific. I am going to add it to the trading links.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Welp, AA reported, I guess, and it looks like whatever happened (because of work I haven't had time to catch up), they're down 5%, as is CENX. I think I may have said that I was looking for a good report, but because of the energy costs, the market would pull them down like a flying monkey.

    CLf is in the same category.

    OK, who's next? I can't wait for my favorite short, X to report. I mean, they haven't made any money for, let's see, a whole bunch of quarters. If they pop, well, it's a fix. short that pop, for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Dss:

    QE2 has not been buying equities.

    QE2 has been going to European central banks and national banks to buy-back their Treasury investments, so they can re-distribute the cash among the Euro central banks and try to keep the Euro stronger than Bucky.

    Bucky down today.

    Bernank doing a fine job.

    ReplyDelete
  27. The Conspirator

    Is a good movie. For today.

    It can't do anything for Abe.

    It was a required watch for us, but I haven't been required to see it, mostly because everybody at work knows my position on his murder.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Well today should be a far less busy day for me - hopefully the markets will give me something to pay attention to.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anyone wanna bet Medicare is going to be replaced with vouchers? I can imagine the insurance companies will be pushing as hard as they can for that to happen. Bubbliscious! Will have to start looking into technology work in the healthcare industry.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Dss, remember Rock's name.

    There were a couple of greasers in high school who wanted to call me Brick, but the guys just stuck with Rock.

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Thor:

    I think we ought to replace Medicare with tickets to Taiwan and chits for service at hospitals there.

    Anybody who wants medical care, can go.
    They can't sue.
    Anybody who wants to sue, or not get medical care, can stay. And die.

    It will help one of our economic partners, it will help entitlements, and it will help airlines' revenue. What could be better?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Bernank doing a fine job.April 12, 2011 at 11:48 AM

    Rock - That got a good laugh from me.

    Yes, Bernanke is my hero.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  33. Thor - For the past few months I have been concidering changing career paths.

    Although I have experience in certain aspects of healthcare, I have no IT experience in it, but it seems like an IT job in the healthcare industry just might be the way to go.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  34. Rock - hah, that's a brilliant idea. I do love hearing about healthcare in other countries though, it really forces us to confront much of the misinformation we are often fed by the insurance companies and MSM.

    ReplyDelete
  35. SU on Finviz.com,

    right on the trendline from Nov'10.


    ICan

    ReplyDelete
  36. Really good article:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/rogerbootle/8441470/Eurozone-ship-is-on-the-course-that-was-set-for-it-heading-for-the-rocks.html#

    Everyone is now focused on government debt as the nub of the problem. And the numbers are shocking.

    The debt to GDP ratio is over 140pc in Greece. Indeed, it is all but impossible for Greece to adjust through fiscal austerity. It is caught in a debt trap from which the only escapes are inflation (which is impossible if you are still in the euro), default, or being bailed out.

    As with most things "euro", the bail-outs provided to Greece and Ireland – and now on offer to Portugal – aren't quite what they seem. They are high interest loans. If this is any sort of remedy, it is for a different malady.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Taibbi weighs in. Things get curiouser & curiouser.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/matt-taibbi-asks-why-fed-gave-220-million-bailout-money-wives-two-morgan-stanley-bigwigs

    ReplyDelete
  38. Here's the direct link:

    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-real-housewives-of-wall-street-look-whos-cashing-in-on-the-bailout-20110411

    ReplyDelete
  39. But we must never EVER EVER raise taxes on these people. No sirree Bobby.....

    "The technical name of the program that Mack and Karches took advantage of is TALF, short for Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility. But the federal aid they received actually falls under a broader category of bailout initiatives, designed and perfected by Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, called "giving already stinking rich people gobs of money for no fucking reason at all." If you want to learn how the shadow budget works, follow along. This is what welfare for the rich looks like."

    ReplyDelete
  40. Reading another article on the Euro, by non other that Steve Forbes and noticed the major disconnect.

    Article is here:

    http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2011/0425/opinions-steve-forbes-fact-comment-memo-to-merkel.html

    First quote -

    "And here we come to Merkel & Co.'s second big error: Forcing these financially troubled countries to undergo bone-crunching austerity in order to continue financing unsustainable, short-term debt is not politically viable.

    Followed by

    By all means, put pressure on the PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, Spain) to whack government spending, but at the same time urge these countries to drastically reduce personal and business income tax rates. They should, in fact, enact a flat tax, as many eastern and central European nations have already done. Their economies would rapidly rise. Then the restructured debt would quickly soar to par value. Commercial banks wouldn't have to take a writedown on those bonds and would thus avoid eviscerating their already inadequate capital.

    How exactly are any of these governments supposed to simultaneously pay down their debt burdens while at the same time lowering taxes. He mentions restructuring briefly in the article but to me, this article sounds like the same BS we get here in the states from the financial industry. The myth that you can simply lower taxes across the board and things will magically get better.

    It's insanity, and these our today's titan's of industry?

    ReplyDelete
  41. More.....

    "It's hard to imagine a pair of people you would less want to hand a giant welfare check to — yet that's exactly what the Fed did. Just two months before the Macks bought their fancy carriage house in Manhattan, Christy and her pal Susan launched their investment initiative called Waterfall TALF. Neither seems to have any experience whatsoever in finance, beyond Susan's penchant for dabbling in thoroughbred racehorses. But with an upfront investment of $15 million, they quickly received $220 million in cash from the Fed, most of which they used to purchase student loans and commercial mortgages. The loans were set up so that Christy and Susan would keep 100 percent of any gains on the deals, while the Fed and the Treasury (read: the taxpayer) would eat 90 percent of the losses. Given out as part of a bailout program ostensibly designed to help ordinary people by kick-starting consumer lending, the deals were a classic heads-I-win, tails-you-lose investment."

    ReplyDelete
  42. Manny - oooooh, reading. . . .

    ReplyDelete
  43. Divergence in the ticks, no new tick lows even though the ES made new lows.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Truly incredible stuff, Thor. It just goes on and on and on and on and on.....

    ReplyDelete
  45. Maybe one of his best articles ever:

    "As America girds itself for another round of lunatic political infighting over which barely-respirating social program or urgently necessary federal agency must have their budgets permanently sacrificed to the cause of billionaires being able to keep their third boats in the water, it's important to point out just how scarce money isn't in certain corners of the public-spending universe. In the coming months, when you watch Republican congressional stooges play out the desperate comedy of solving America's deficit problems by making fewer photocopies of proposed bills, or by taking an ax to budgetary shrubberies like NPR or the SEC, remember Christy Mack and her fancy new carriage house. There is no belt-tightening on the other side of the tracks. Just a free lunch that never ends."

    ReplyDelete
  46. Manny - Ugh It will end though, I promise you that. I'll bet money it ends within our lifetime as well. If not a sharp, sudden return to normalcy, then a slow creep back to sanity. The Sheeple will only put up with so much, I think as soon as the average Joe realizes what's really been happening, and they see that nothing much improves by cutting NPR or Planned Parenthood, as soon as you hear people saying "What do you mean my taxes still have to go up, we ended all foreign aide!" then we'll see a change.

    And if you think that that's fantasy . . . well, it is :P A guy can hope right?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Ummmmm -

    Gasoline prices up 40% this summer, U.S. says


    Don’t look now, but the summer driving season’s going to run motorists a lot more money than in 2010, according to the latest federal price forecast.

    Ugh, that would bring a fill-up to over 100 bucks. My commute isn't anywhere near a long one by Southern California standards - imagine the folks who will soon be spending $400 a month just in gas. What will people cut next? Food?

    ReplyDelete
  48. BRICs Summit,

    "Brics ready for landmark accord".

    To facilitate easier access to each other's markets.

    India says no proposal to replace Yuan with Dollar.

    http://tribuneindia.com

    ICan

    ReplyDelete
  49. From Trader Mark's blog - fundmymutualfund.com

    Video:CNBC - Muddywaters: Beware The Chinese Reverse Mergers.

    "NY Mag: The Revoloving Door Between Washington and WallStreet".

    ReplyDelete
  50. I realized today that my bullishness lately is directly related to how my company is doing right now. Our sales are literally through the roof, each of the last four quarters have been records for us, and we're already up 30% this year. You all know that we sell a highly discretionary product that is not cheap (nothing is less than $100). People out there do have money to spend, and our sales are up across all regions and all demographics as well.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @Thor: Remember, the economy isn't the market and vice versa.

    Also, I would add that your company is doing well I'm guessing at least partly because people view your products as a cost effective substitute for costly health clubs. Would you agree? In that vein, I would say that your company's recent success may be indicated of a longer term trend of trading DOWN because people have LESS money to spend. Just my two cents.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Manny - yes actually, that's a very good point. I wonder if gym memberships are down?

    ReplyDelete
  53. Great question, Thor. My little cheap, no frills gym traffic seems to be up to me in comparison to prior years. Have been a member since early '07 when it opened. I've heard that big health clubs like Lifetime Fitness are doing OK betting more dough out of their existing club members for add-ons like personal training, classes, etc., but are having a harder time recruiting new members.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Getting more dough, not betting...

    ReplyDelete
  55. Manny - from the other day, didn't have a chance to respond. Student loan debt outpacing credit card debt. My god. What on EARTH are we doing to this generation? You can't ever get out of student loans. How many of these kids are going to be making salaries that enable them to pay off a 100K student loan? What's next? Debt prisons?

    ReplyDelete
  56. @Thor: Don't laugh. That could be next, although the prison of having to toil at a job or series of jobs (and bosses/companies) that one may truly loathe is often "prison" enough if you ask me. I think that's the whole point or goal here, creating a powerless group of people that have very little negotiating leverage in terms of salaries or waiting for better jobs and pay.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Manny - you say that almost as if it had been engineered . . .

    ReplyDelete
  58. @Thor: Maybe not directly so, but I do think that by-product of the debt trap is all too welcomed by those in charge for obvious reasons. All about control and power.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Agree - and I do think there has been a little bit of engineering, certainly with regard to destroying workers rights and vilifying government, unions, and public employees. Not very well thought out engineering though - now they're going after Medicare? I wonder if that's wise, seniors being a very important voting block. I also wonder if perhaps Medicare will be spared in the name of "compromise" while Medicaid is gutted.

    ReplyDelete