Pages

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Thoughts on future directions

With the chop lately, Rock’s not been making much money. It seems we actually had the start of a trend reversal, but looks like it’s back to normal, up up and away.

I think we all realize in the short term, the government is trying its best to help Wall Street, and not Main Street. The basic reason for this is because Main street had to bail out Wall Street, and the Government doesn’t want that to happen again, so while we establish regulations to hopefully prevent banksters from going there, we need to keep the markets up. Then Main Street doesn’t have to bail out the banksters or the pension funds, and we will all be saved from creating a lot more debt.

We need to keep interest rates low. I watched the Bernank address congress where he said this spending can’t go on forever and we need to get some fiscal responsibility. In the mean time, the Bernank will keep interest rates low so the US debt doesn’t increase because we have to pay a lot of interest. How do we do that? Buy bonds, keep interest rates down. Definition of QE2.

Congress is likely to take years to decide how to cut spending. I may be dead by then, but I’ve seen a couple of green shoots: there’s talk of a transfer tax, and rich guys have said they could pay more taxes. But we need more than green shoots.

So let’s have a look around at the market. We must try to get ourselves ahead. Granted the job picture is weak, so structurally we don’t want investment in stocks that need lots of consumer spending or non-necessities. I suspect the jobs picture will be very bleak for years. There may be some shining stars in the best sectors, and there may be some real underperformers in the poorer sectors, so still you must be careful and do your homework. So structurally, where do we go?

1. Defense spending. As more saber-rattling happens in Korea, and Afghanistan, we will need to continue defense spending. I saw an article that some pentagon leader is worried about defense spending cuts, but it ain’t gonna happen. So research what companies are primarily here, and post em to our blog.
2. Oil and Gas—equipment and services, not reserves. People will drive, even with fewer jobs, they will drive.
3. Coals—we will use electricity (he says, as his coffee cup sits on the warmer, 4 monitors on, 3 computers on, and a future of electric cars needing charging)
4. High-end retail. The rich will continue to buy, and give their kids money to spend.
5. Ultra low-end retail. The poor will look for better ways to spend the tiny amount of cash they’ve got
6. Cash driven businesses. Like gambling and high-end resorts or high-end reits. Places where people can take their illegally gotten cash and dump or launder it. Like the Sands, especially if they are an overseas branch, like our new Sands here in Singapore.
7. Metals and mining: precious metals, especially ones that get used up. Not copper. Silver, platinum are good.
8. Cheap home entertainment. Nintendo, Sony, Note Phillips just bought Saeco, maybe we should short Starbucks
9. Baby stuff. More time at home, well, I also said cheap entertainment……I actually think a baby boom may lead us out of this non-depression we’re in. I have little hope of China or emerging markets in general leading us out because I’ve been there, and I’ve seen. Too many basic necessities are missing.
10. Semis. This is kind of like "basic materials" for our technological world, and I don't see that sector going away, or underperforming like the following.

Places to stay away from:
1. Middle retail. No jobs, no spending, no profits. These guys are relying on developing markets for their additional revenues, not looking at the US. With the emerging market’s impending inflation, I don’t think they’re in very good shape. Thank you, QE2.
2. Solar. My heart is there, but my pocketbook says fossil energy will be cheaper for tens of years.
3. Home schooling. I think a lot of people got a dose of reality when they realized there weren’t any jobs for accredited schools’ graduates.
4. Medical: instrumentation, drugs, the whole thing. First, it is unknown what new regulations will be coming, and with the hospitals losing money because of lawsuits, the services will drop. Get ready to travel outside the US if you need a major medical event.
5. Banks. They are insolvent. A new regulation could bury them, and could happen any day of the week. If you invest here, you are taking a substantial risk that would be lower almost anywhere else.
6. Emerging markets. They are facing huge inflation, especially as China moves the RMB. When your food is going up daily, you don’t spend on other things. Like India is now.
7. Currencies. Too volatile. Sovereign debt. Political fights over Euro. Trading wars. Just too much risk.
8. Techs. Too much interbreeding. And remember, you've seen major CEOs jump ship and try to enter politics. Somehow, this seems oxymoronic. Or just moronic.
9. Insurance. sorry, Dad. I just wouldn't put money into a piece of the Rock just now.

Now a couple of charts. Yeah, I know. You thought Rock wasn’t gonna have charts.

First, interesting charts are the number of companies that are above their 50 day and 200 day moving averages. These are 3LB charts, the ones I like to use to evaluate trends, courtesy of Stockcharts.com.





The trend looks up to me.

Second, (or third, if you’re counting) is the SPY. Sorry, Mutt, but it looks like the trend’s in favor of going long.


74 comments:

  1. Meanwhile, in Germany . . .


    Germans Get Jobs for Life as Boom Shrinks Worker Pool

    BASF SE, the world’s largest chemicals maker, last month followed Siemens AG in granting job security for the 33,000 workers at its Ludwigshafen plant. Siemens, the biggest German company by market value, said in September it will indefinitely secure locations and jobs for all its 128,000 domestic employees in the most sweeping concession to local workers yet. Utility E.ON AG and carmaker Porsche AG have similar accords.

    Unemployment in Europe’s largest economy has tumbled to the lowest level in 18 years, as companies seek skilled workers to sustain an economic rebound that shows few signs of cooling. The demand for local talent marks a shift from a decade-long trend of companies moving production abroad to escape high wages and German labor market regulation that hampered hiring and firing.


    Those nasty socialists with all their needless bureaucracy. Do you see now? Do you SEE how they are paying the price for their profligate ways?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rock, I owe you some instructions, I haven't forgotten!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you Rock
    A very nice compass for what awaits us ahead regarding economic sectors and their chances to prosper or go down.
    Dan

    ReplyDelete
  4. My 10min chart tells me sell-off coming today at my place French CAC40. Will finish the day in the red. Since it's US markets moving French stocks, I guess it means SP500 will fall to begin with.:p

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Wolfstreet:

    man, my eyes must be getting bad. I read that I O min and even googled it....

    ReplyDelete
  6. On my trading radar:

    JRCC has hit the managed peak that it seems to not be able to cross. If I get a lower high in the 60 minute chart when the stocs turn, I will start a short entry.

    Also, my favorite short, X, is acting like it's run out of gas. n 12/7, there was a pretty big sell spike, and looks like we're getting a lower high. If the stocs turn, I will begin my usual short.

    Please be aware that I don't want to fight the Fed. This is *not* a shorting market. My short entries will be designed to lose no more than about $100. My stop point on JRCC will be around 23.28. On X, my stop point will be about 54.46.

    Hopefully the algos will agree with me, but we'll see.

    ReplyDelete
  7. My apologies for posting that before reading my e-mail.

    ReplyDelete
  8. ICan's Comments from the other post

    Anonymous said...

    WOW, two good post in one day. Rock's and Emmy's.

    All the numbers, from China's trade to consumer sentiment came in postitive.

    Pimco upped global growth estimates to 3.5 from 3%.

    China upped reserve requirement for banks, and inflation is slowing. That's good for risk on.

    Jim Chanos is back on CNBC.

    "Investing behind the wall". http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1691090837&play=1

    If China goes, so does Germany, Canada, Australia and Brazil.

    He said 60% of China's economy is construction. So if China slows down, so does steel and iron ore.




    December 10, 2010 10:09 AM
    Anonymous said...

    "October deficit goes on diet". marketwatch.com

    October figure represent lowest U.S. trade deficit since January".

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Thor,

    This is the best part of Germany's management strategy and it will never be implemented here in the US:


    "German workers have more clout than in other countries because they are represented in the highest echelons of company management. Every supervisory board of publicly traded companies is evenly split between representatives for management and employees. That system, unique to Germany, gives works councils and union members more sway over strategy, hiring and firing, as well as the pay of senior executives."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Imagine a system in the US where senior executives have to answer to the workers regarding their compensation. I don't think that European executive compensation got out of control like ours did and this is why.

    ReplyDelete
  11. What happen to my comments? I posted under emmy's thread?

    @Rock great, timely thread.

    Trade numbers everywhere postive. Consumer sentiment postive. Pimco is raising world gdp growth from 3-3.5%. IEA revised oil demand upwards. China's inflation is slowing, yet they raised reserve requirements.

    Jim Chanos was on CNBC this morning. Reasons why he is short China.

    http://www.cnbc.com/video/

    His reason for China short, 60% of China gdp is construction, empty buildings etc. So steel and iron not good longs.

    So Canada, Australia, Germany and Brazil in trouble?

    If anyone else watch that video - please comment.

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sorry, double comments.

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  13. Great post, Rock! One defense stock that I've owned as a core holding is RTN.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Morning all!

    Emmie - no worries buddy!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Kinda nice for us to be in a position where we have so many folks who are willing and able to post. Very nice indeed :-)

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Emmy,

    Sometimes the communication thing here on the blog is not as efficient as we would like. Sorry for the confustion!

    ReplyDelete
  17. @jeff, Thor, Denise,

    Exactly your sentiment I believe:

    "Americans in Poll want Deficit Cut with Entitlelments Secured". http://noir.bloomberg.com

    "Minimize the pain and make the rich pay".

    "The public want Congress to keep its hands off entitilements such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security".

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  18. @I Can

    What Americans want has been ignored for decades, so I don't see them doing anything to fix things now.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Exactly, I Can, but Congress (made up mostly of rich people) keep ignoring the wishes of the people outside of their little bubble. And they act clueless as to why people are so pissed. The KNOW why and they DON'T CARE.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Another marginal high for the S&P.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I heard an interesting piece on NPR last night with Lamar Alexander. Was entertaining because he kept getting into it with the interviewer over the tax cuts for the wealthy. Every time she said "tax cuts" he would say "you keep calling these tax cuts and they aren't tax cuts they're tax increases we're trying to prevent!"

    You could hear the annoyance in her voice, I swear she wanted to say to him "I'm sorry Senator Alexander but I'm not as 'on message' as you appear to be"

    Made me immediately think of what Denise said yesterday, that we're now in a place in this country where if an outright lie is repeated often enough "tax cuts for the wealthy spur job creation" it becomes accepted as fact.

    ReplyDelete
  22. It's not even really a "tax cut" per se, Thor, but merely borrowing against future revenues. So much for worrying about the deficit and "caring about our childrens'" futures.

    ReplyDelete
  23. If the tax cuts aren't funded, then they aren't really tax cuts. That's my point.

    ReplyDelete
  24. http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/12/tax-bill-to-add-857-billion-to-debt.html

    ReplyDelete
  25. Extreme levels of bullishness? Mission accomplished, Benny. The bubble is back.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/rydex-nasdaq-100-bullbear-ratio-highest-dot-com-collapse

    ReplyDelete
  26. This is one reason why I despise the Republican mentality.

    They lie about everything in order to get their precious tax cuts.

    They lie about being deficit hawks when all they care about is tax cuts, and dismantling entitlements.

    They lie when they say that tax cuts create jobs.

    They lie when they say that allowing the wealthiest to keep their tax cuts creates even more jobs than when the middle and lower classes keep them.

    They lied about the cost, duration and ultimate goals of the two wars we cannot afford. How come we can afford one billion a day for two wars and tax cuts for those who so patriotically wanted them? No shared sacrifice here, ever.

    How do you know when they are lying, their lips are moving.

    And don't get me started on the Democratic liars, they are plenty of them to go around, too.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Exactly Denise. They lie because they view it is all part of the "game" to "win". By any means necessary, and if they "win", that's justificaiton enough that they were "right".

    The Dems, on the other hand, are just spineless, soulless, convictionless little weasels. So what's worse?

    ReplyDelete
  28. @Mannwich

    Wasn't supposed to show up at that time. My mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Bubbles?

    Youku (NYSE:YOUKU).

    On Wed. IPO at $12.

    Thursday's close - $42.70

    "Why I am short Youku, the most overvalued stock in the universe". businessinsider.com

    P.S. This is not a recommendation. Do your own due diligence.

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  30. Ron Paul defends WikiLeaks on the floor of the house. He makes many good points.

    Ron Paul

    Number 1: Do the America People deserve know the truth regarding the ongoing wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen?

    Number 2: Could a larger question be how can an army private access so much secret information?

    Number 3: Why is the hostility mostly directed at Assange, the publisher, and not at our governments failure to protect classified information?

    Number 4: Are we getting our moneys worth of the 80 Billion dollars per year spent on intelligence gathering?

    Number 5: Which has resulted in the greatest number of deaths: lying us into war or Wikileaks revelations or the release of the Pentagon Papers?

    Number 6: If Assange can be convicted of a crime for publishing information that he did not steal, what does this say about the future of the first amendment and the independence of the internet?

    Number 7: Could it be that the real reason for the near universal attacks on Wikileaks is more about secretly maintaining a seriously flawed foreign policy of empire than it is about national security?

    Number 8: Is there not a huge difference between releasing secret information to help the enemy in a time of declared war, which is treason, and the releasing of information to expose our government lies that promote secret wars, death and corruption?

    Number 9: Was it not once considered patriotic to stand up to our government when it is wrong?

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Rock10:24 lol. Too many screens hurting your eyes. So much for my sell-off anyway. CAC40 finished the day unchanged. I hold on to my short term bearish view for Monday. US markets may still show some red today though, not looking that good either on 10min.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Of course there are many of his stances that I do not agree with as well and I think his son is one of the biggest hypocrites to ever enter the senate.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Breaking out to new highs. Santa Claus rally, just as Manny predicted.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Denise -all excellent points!

    God I wish we could get a viable third party in this country. I'm just so sick of both parties I could spit.

    ReplyDelete
  35. @I Can

    50 to 38!

    Man, if I didn't have work...

    ReplyDelete
  36. Definitely SOME great points, Denise. So we're going to charge this guy with espionage? Really? So who's next? Bloggers or the MSM, who only report and expose leaked information on powerful people? Individual citizens or whistleblowers that make the powerful look bad? A really slippery slope we're on now. This has a potentially chilling effect on anyone outing anyone of power or privelege in any form.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Santa loves him some tax cuts. Rally ho Wall Street! Paint those year-end statements with some green and then pay me some bonus money, please!

    ReplyDelete
  38. Pretty tight trading range so far today

    ReplyDelete
  39. I think this is weird. It's like a thief telling the home owners - their door is open.

    Yesterday, BOC said they are worried about Canadians loading on debt. Today, "Bankers Sound Alarms on Loans". www.financialpost.com

    If BOC really cared, why did they leave rates at 1% when inflation is at 3%?

    If bankers really cared, they wouldn't lend to people who cannot afford. It's the bankers who cried out loud during the melt down of 2009 and made the govt take all that crappy mortgages from their books to CMHC.

    It's everyone covering their ass. Let the taxpayers hold the bag if Chanos's prediction on China is true.

    I Can

    ReplyDelete
  40. @dss:

    Did you ever wonder why Wikileaks doesn't wikileak everything at once?

    You don't suppose, perhaps, we're looking at laundered data? Otherwise, why would it take so ong to cut-and-paste onto a webpage?

    ReplyDelete
  41. @I Can: Because they're not really that worried. It's similar to Greenie's comments about the market being "frothy". CYA.

    ReplyDelete
  42. So when do we label Assange "enemy combatant" or "terrorist"? That would allow us to waterboard him, no?

    ReplyDelete
  43. ICan: Maybe it's the same fear we have here? That any rise in the interest rates will choke off growth. Sounds silly, housing and consumer debt aren't that huge a part of the Canadian economy are they?

    ReplyDelete
  44. @Thor: True but since when does any reasonable, critical thinking person take her seriously.

    On another note, check out this pic of Sonja Cohn, Austrian Banker being sued in the Madoff case. What a strange looking, ahem, person.

    http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/12/10/madoff-trustee-seeks-19-6-billion-from-austrian-banker/?hp

    ReplyDelete
  45. Anyone else following the recent crazy free agent contract signings in MLB? Wow, no recession there, I guess. It's just unreal what these guys are getting in what's supposed to be a shaky economy.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Neat article - We're really going gangbusters with renewable energy out here. There's a massive wind farm along Highway 10 driving into Palm Spring that's been there since the 70's, I've noticed them replacing a bunch of the older turbines as well as adding new ones. More and more of our friends in PS are also getting solar. Southern Edison has recently agreed to allow homeowners to bank their electricity over the year for when they need it. We have one pair of friends who are very close to not having to pay for electricity at all anymore - (big house, lots of solar panels).

    Port adds 5,000 solar panels to cruise terminal rooftop

    Energy generated from the sun's rays will help power facilities at the Port of Los Angeles, with help from 5,000 solar panels that were recently installed, officials announced Thursday.

    The solar panels, spanning 71,500 square feet on the port's cruise terminal rooftop, are capable of generating one megawatt that will be routed to the city's power grid, leading to about $200,000 in annual savings.

    The project is expected to reduce about 22,800 metric tons of carbon dioxide over the system's 25-year lifespan, the equivalent of taking 4,367 cars off the street, port officials said.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Manny - That picture hurts my Hollywood Eyes :-)

    Something tells me Fraulein Cohn used to be a man.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Greg!!

    (Reuters) - Apple Inc is preparing new iPads, including models that are about half the size of the current tablet computer, and will include front- and back-mounted cameras, supply chain sources told Reuters.

    I've been holding off on buying an iPad, I hope the new features were worth the wait.

    ReplyDelete
  49. LOL Thor. That pic is very Saturday Night Live-esque.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I've been waiting as well, Thor. Still not totally sure I'd use a tablet computer all that much. Seems duplicative to me.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Manny - good point. I'll probably surrender to it though. . .

    ReplyDelete
  52. Also, thks Rock for the handy list of best and worst sectors.

    I'd add a theme which may be worth investigate: security. I believe it makes sense that companies dealing with security may prove a solid investment.

    However revolting, I think we'll agree that inequalities are likely to rise in the US for the coming years. Namely due to those problems you mentioned:weak job market and deficits that need to be cut, therefore leading to "austerity" measures. With growing poverty and inequalities comes rising crime, unfortunately. And companies that provide security services, or security systems (see DGLY for example), may be well positioned to gain from an eventual growing insecurity.

    Similar to the undertaker making good business in the Lucky Luke comics...

    ReplyDelete
  53. @Mannwich

    "Anyone else following the recent crazy free agent contract signings in MLB? Wow, no recession there, I guess. It's just unreal what these guys are getting in what's supposed to be a shaky economy."

    I like how the Yankees tried to nickel-and-dime their most-iconic player and then offered the moon to Cliff Lee. Kinda like how Goodell is concerned about player safety but wants an 18-game NFL season (which neither the players or the fans want).

    ReplyDelete
  54. It's crazy, isn't it, emmy? There's gotta be a bubble still blowing in major league sports that's gonna pop someday. I believe the NFL and maybe the NBA are heading towards lockouts next year, from what I've heard. The NBA lost like $300MM last year.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Emmanuel117 - I hear you on extending the season to 18 weeks. I LOVE football, but wouldn't support it running into 18 weeks. Besides were would the extra week come from? Tack it onto the beginning of the season, no one would watch it tack it on the end of the season, people would get burned out.

    As far as those monster MLB salaries you mention, it is already expensive enuff to go to a game, the money for those star players has to come from somewhere and more then likely it come in increased admission costs. At what point do people just say screw this, I will stay home and watch the game?

    Mangy Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  56. Isn't this predictable? And some of us still wonder why we have the banking policies that we do. Can you say 100% captured?

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/10/ciitgroup-hires-peter-ors_n_794880.html

    ReplyDelete
  57. Manny - Bingo

    He was one of the president's most prominent advisers and remains well-connected in U.S. political circles.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Mannwich - Back when basketbrawel use to be a team sport it was worth watching, even with a great player like Michael Jorden it took a team.

    Yea Scottie Pippen fed him the ball a lot and MJ was able to score at will on whatever team he was playing against, but at least he seemed to understand it was a team event.

    Now days it seems like most teams go after a big name player and have everyone else play around him. Which IMHO has made the game 1 dementional.

    In all honesty I would not be sad at all to see the NBA fold.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  59. Go Bernie Go!!! I love it. Get out the cots!!

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/10/bernie-sanders-filibuster_n_795087.html

    ReplyDelete
  60. That's somewhat true, Mutt, but the best teams in the NBA today actually do play a pretty high quality brand of team ball. I'm referring to the Lakers, Celtics, Spurs, Magic, Mavericks and a few others. Those teams actually play very well together.

    ReplyDelete
  61. The O-man goes to the bullpen to the political triangulating master for political backing.

    http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/10/bill-clinton-holds-court-in-impromptu-white-house-news-conference/?hp

    ReplyDelete
  62. Manny - What I don't understand is why he just won't officially filibuster it? Force the Republicans to find 60 votes. I'm sure they could, but it would force the issue once and for all.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Bernie's been going on for over 6 hours now. Gotta love the guy's determination and stamina. No food or bathroom breaks?

    ReplyDelete
  64. Senate vote scheduled for Monday - Now it's up to the House.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Mannwich - I hope he is wearing some Depends.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  66. Bernie is the only one who tells it like it is. Love the guy.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Thor has a movie, who knew?



    First 'Thor' Trailer Unveils a Different Breed of Superhero

    Tony Stark is a brilliant inventor who built a suit of armor to become a mechanized warrior. Bruce Banner is a gifted scientist whose experiments turned him into a hulking monster. Peter Parker is a high school student given amazing powers by a spider bite.

    But Thor, Marvel's latest big-screen superhero, is a god.

    Inspired by Norse mythology, Thor was created by Stan Lee, Larry Lieber and Jack Kirby in 1962. Now, the character is finally coming to the big screen from Marvel Studios, the same company that made the hugely successful "Iron Man" movies.

    The studio's grand idea is that both the Thor and Iron Man exist in the same universe, and that eventually they will team up with Hulk and Captain America in "The Avengers." But how will Thor's mythological gods and monsters match up with Iron Man's high-tech (and more realistic) world?

    ReplyDelete
  68. @Mannwich, Thor

    the article says "she's a self-made woman" which supports Thor's theory.

    That could hurt.

    ReplyDelete