Pages

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

The Master Swing Trader

There was a comment a few days ago I’ve been thinking about, so I thought I’d put together a few posts on some of the content of The Master Swing Trader by Alan Farley. We all have our favorite books, but out of the ones I’ve read, I think this one covers quite a lot of useful trading stuff, however, has quite a bit of randomness in thought, and I think he assumes you know what his terminology means, because when he uses a new term, he doesn’t define it or show an example. It’s kind of hard to follow, so I’ll put down in the next few posts some salient features.

Farley talks about a trend and a range. What he means by this is that there will be a price range that a stock is trading in, and the trend is essentially the centerline of the range. Like this:




He talks about patterns and cycles. His idea of patterns is not the Japanese Candlestick patterns I posted about last week, but his concept is that these ranges rise and fall, and make trend patterns. In a later post, we’ll talk about some of the reasons for the patterns and useful information about helping predict their nature. Anyway, here is a stock that is displaying one of my favorite patterns, the ‘W”



The W is kind of hard to see, it’s in the heavy green lines in the center of the ranges. But if you can see it, you'll see that this is a W where the right side has a higher low, and then goes to a higher high. This is a great pattern for making money, and I almost always use it for my trades; I never enter on a high. I only enter on a pullback. More on that later.

Farley talks about reasons for these patterns to repeat themselves, in cycles. You can see in the CLF example above, that the W will repeat itself in time, as you move the time scale to the right. He mentions other aspects of the market, which help suggest reasons for the changing cycles, including mob philosophy, TICK, futures, and credit. These will be topics of posts in the future, so you get and introduction of how these can affect the cyclic nature of the patterns.

Not to be too long, here’s an example of my "favorite short". I am trading this long right now. (The reason it’s my favorite short is because it continues upward and when I look at the P/E on the balance sheet, it’s negative). Before you look at the chart, our goal is to try to predict what will happen tomorrow, because that’s how we make money, When you look at the chart, before the final price bar (assuming you don’t know it’s tomorrow yet), you need to determine if you should leave the stock, that is, will X break trend and turn lower, and follow the new green line trend range, or should you stay/add, hoping it will continue trending positive, in its range. And what reasons do you have to take this position? It’s in the chart, but follow the heavy green line downward, it will show you the reason.



As you can see from the relative strength, the price action of X relative to the S&P 500 is accelerating. The slope of the relative strength line is positive. X’s stronger than the market. If you put up a chart of the S&P, you would see it’s trending up. Therefore, my bet was that X would not go counter-trend. (Don't fight the tape). I stayed in, and added on the close. Today, I got a 3% pop.

120 comments:

  1. Forgot the credit. Charts courtesy of TDAmeritrade's StrategyDesk.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bill Keating is sponsoring a bill to keep American companies from being internet missiles.

    Ha.

    There is fear.

    http://www.whowouldbenefit.com/?p=889

    ReplyDelete
  3. You know, we could solve the US youth unemployment problem. Hire the script kiddies to target countries we don't like, and companies that steal our IP, and whoever we want to put down.

    The kiddies would make money and buy cars. The market would improve. Other countries would be put down.

    Telephones would come back into vogue. Maybe teletypes and telexes.

    It could be good.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I got stopped out of my favorite short, X.

    I am looking for a return to around 61, where I would re-enter on the long side.

    I won't short X, just because I think it's going to retrace a little, because you don't fight the tape. It may continue up up and away. But not with me. When we're trading at the top of the range, well, it's time to become cautious.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rock,

    You are holding down the fort! Thanks!.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Need some coffee to wake up. I like the sound of your title, but I am not alert enough to read it. Sounds very enticing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Morning all! Ditto Denise! Rock, reading now!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Been Watching X FilesFebruary 16, 2011 at 10:16 AM

    Rock - I have no intention of shorting X, but ever since you started talking about it I have been watching it more closely and it seems like just about every other stock....it keeps going up. it will have a little pull back then continue up.

    It has been good for me to watch and see this type of movement and I am starting to think as long as X goes up so will the rest of the market, almost like X will be the canary. Now of course I am wrong, because I am always wrong (Except that 1 time where my wife said I was right)

    Anyway, best of luck with you on X as it has been interesting to watch.

    Mangy Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  9. Excellent post... will add some thoughts if there is any downtime today...

    Have a feeling I will be on "pullback watch" for the remainder of the day.

    Its been a good morning so far...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mutt,

    What you are doing is exactly how you can learn about how stocks act. Watching one or two bell weather stocks can give you a great deal of information as you are using the same stock's action as it rallies or declines, whether it tracks the S&P or not.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I just saw Ed Lazear on Bloomberg.

    My God, we are led by assholes. Um, WolfStreet, sorry for my French.

    He says we want workers wages to rise. Bullshit!!! We do not want workers wages to rise. We want more workers to participate in a positive wage scenario. Individual workers' wages could and should remain the same.

    He says that we should cut taxes across the board. Bullshit!!! We need to cut spending across the board and specifically target pensions. Anybody receiving a pension should forfeit social Security.

    He says that business invention or innovation should be tax deductible. Bullshit!!!! Businesses should be taxed 150% for all profits moved offshore. Businesses should be allowed to reduce income by their investment in research and development.

    I worked for many many years in an environment where development was an expense. We were still able to spend around 6% of revenues on R&D. Now, companies spend 0%.

    You wanna help America? Stop companies from making other countries hand it to us on a silver platter. Make us do it.

    We can.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Michael Lewis - All you need to know about the Financial Crisis

    A surprising number of my fellow citizens appear to be unaware of my service these past 18 months as a member of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.

    Thus it may come as news that I have declined to sign the report issued by the majority, or the dissent by the three- member minority, or even the dissent from their dissent, written by the now-immortal Peter J. Wallison. I hereby dissent from the dissent from the dissent. My dissent is different from all those other dissents, which is why I am dissenting.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anybody here use netflix? Would appreciate any thoughts on it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Greg - I use to use Netflix I was signed up for the 3 movies at once for $9.95 a month.

    The turn around time between order, receiving and dropping off and them receiving was usually within 24 hours.

    We never used the down load on line feature.

    Personally I did not like the way they had the queuing or how you picked a movie set up, but other then that, I had no problems with them.

    The reason we stopped was because we would have a movie sit on the counter for weeks before we watched it. And if you ain't using something there is no reason to be paying for it.

    Mangy Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  15. Greg - LOVE Netflix. Can't beat it for foreign or independent film.

    Well worth the 24 bucks or so a month. That's not even two trips to the movies here in LA

    ReplyDelete
  16. greg,

    We have been Netflix customers almost from the start. Love it! We have the four at a time plan. The best part is never having to go back and forth to the video store, never having a late fee, and choosing things to watch from my home computer. We have caught up on television series we have missed, movies, documentaries, etc. It doesn't bother me to have a few movies sitting if we get really busy because something is there always when we get free, no need to run out to try and find something to watch.

    We also use the download feature for movies and my daughter at college accesses my account to watch her favorites on her computer. I think she had almost 20 downloads just from her computer alone.

    We absolutely love it!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Rock,

    Great post! Thanks for the explanations. I learn something new everyday in trading just by seeing what other's see.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @ Rock

    I might have to email my thoughts on this post... its getting too deep for a comment. You have received my emails, correct?

    @ Mutt

    We have snowflakes the size of half dollars falling out of the sky in swwa...

    ReplyDelete
  19. @greg

    I can't use netflix here, but I tried it in the US for a few months. I found the DVDs were of poor quality, and since I used my PC as the entertainment server for my TV/home theater, many DVDs would not play back using PowerDVD.

    If I had a DVD player, perhaps my experience would have been different.

    I was not a member when download was available, so that may make it acceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Rock - Excellent post - a primer, followed by it's real world application!

    ReplyDelete
  21. I-Man - Noway! snow-flakes can be that big? So jealous, it supposed to rain here for the next week :-(

    ReplyDelete
  22. OK, they are the size of golf balls right now...

    I havent seen flakes this big since I was living in New England...

    ReplyDelete
  23. nflx..thanks for the comments. It's just recently available here in Canada and from what I can see the selection is not very good. That's probably our CRTC's fault. Same reason we can't view NBC video here, but I can go to youtube or some other source and view it. Friggin idiots.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I-Man, isn't that snow crazy and them are big'O flakes too, it's not sticking yet, but it looks like it wants to.

    It just might be time for a snow ball fight.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  25. Do you guys normally get snow in your neck of the woods?

    ReplyDelete
  26. greg,

    We have a distribution center fairly close to our house so our selection is great, but I also know that some things that I have requested have had to come from another city, but they compensate for the delay by giving me an extra DVD.

    Rock,

    We have occasional problems with quality but the DVD's we get are normally very good. Also I like that in the spring/summer time when we hardly watch any movies we cut back our subscription to "hold", and then in the late fall we start it back up again.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Rock - Thanks for taking the time to post and your use of clear examples.

    Also your 10:29 is spot on.

    Of course I would like to make more money, but I strongly agree we need more workers as opposed to higher wages, unfortunatly (From where I sit) it seems like companies are taking the oppertunity to higher fewer workers for lower wages - Basically the worst of both worlds.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  28. Thor - I am origanlly for central wa state, were we would get snow (Sometimes the size of what is coming down now) and it would last for weeks and months, so I am use to it.

    I have only been in this area for 2 years and I would have to say this and the size of them is unusual and of course most the drivers over here do not know how to drive in it so the people with 4WD are driving too fast and the little old ladies are driving too slow.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  29. Only when conditions are right...

    In order for us to get snow like this, it has to be a combo of a southwest pacific "pineapple express" hitting either arctic air coming down from canada via the Columbia River gorge, or like today, from an arctic system coming down the coast out of AK...

    So, no... doesnt happen often.

    It would be surprising if it stuck around for a few days.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I-Man & Mutt, not sure how far you guys are from Portland but NPR had a really great piece on the city this morning. About how it's a huge mecca for 20-somethings these days. Didn't get a chance to listen to the whole thing but what I heard was very good.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Too close, LOL...

    JK, I love P-Town, but its a bit much at times.

    But when I need to go into town, thats where I go.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Morning all! Rally on Garth.....

    Great post, Rock.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I wonder how much higher mortgage rates are going to have to go to choke off the rest of this housing "recovery"? Can we make it all the way up to 6%?

    Wasn't QE2 supposed to get that back down?

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Thor: Isn't that where we went the last time before it all completely fell apart?

    ReplyDelete
  35. My wife, who must be paying more attention to my screeds than I thought, originally alerted me to this one that was in our local newspaper (that I never read) the other day.....

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/chris-whalen-wells-fargos-cfo-quit-due-internal-dispute-over-financial-disclosures

    ReplyDelete
  36. Looks like somebody sold everything then went for lunch.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Thor/Denise...when I post a comment, my screen goes blank, doesn't reload the blog site. This is recent. Any thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  38. greg,

    Thor was having some trouble yesterday. I have not had any problems.

    Anyone else having problems?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Borders Files for Bankruptcy, Will Close Some Stores

    Two local stores are closing. I'm wearing a mourning band for the rest of the month.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Greg . . . does it happen regardless of which browser you use? I tend to go back and forth between IE, Safari, and Firefox to test whether the problem is with my browser or the site itself.

    When you say recent, how recent? There's nothing that's changed on the blog that I'm aware of that would cause this. . .we haven't added any new widgets in weeks. . .

    ReplyDelete
  41. Can't possibly be my iMac, must be somebody else's fault!

    ReplyDelete
  42. @Thor...yesterday and today. Only use Safari.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Whoa - what's with this headline . . Iranian warships on their way to the coast of Syria? Anyone following that?

    ReplyDelete
  44. Greg - have you applied the most recent update? The newest version of Safari is version 5.0.3. If you have Firefox installed as well try that.

    If it works in Firefox, and you have the most current version of Safari installed you can try clearing your cache, if that doesn't work you might try clearing your cookies but keep in mind you may lose some login information from some sites if you clear the cache.

    If the problem persists in Firefox let us know, it might be something within the site itself.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Greg - Do you have the 27"? I'm thinking about moving over to one of those from my laptop just for the extra desktop real estate! Beautiful machines aren't they? Do you remember what the 20th anniversary Macs looked like?

    http://www.248am.com/mark/shopping/for-sale-apple-twentieth-anniversary-mac/

    Not to bad considering it was built 14 years ago huh?

    ReplyDelete
  46. TLT brushes 90. My little nibbles looking tasty.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Good job Rock, thks! good to get a primer about W, since you're often discussing it. At first sight though, the W pattern seems to me like it's basically just the movement of prices inside a well formed /regular channel. or am i missing some additional aspects that makes W more than that?

    ReplyDelete
  48. back to "work " check back later

    ReplyDelete
  49. That high 80's area seems to be the magic support area. For now anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Manny,

    Plus it made a fresh high since early February. I nibbled on a bit, too.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Anyone else having problems with the site loading? I had a couple problems yesterday but they seem ok now. Loads fine, no delays or error messages.

    ReplyDelete
  52. 1:00 cst is the FOMC minutes release. Sometimes this has a big effect, sometimes not.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Tomorrow a big day for numbers, CPI, LEI, Philly Fed, plus Bernanke speaks (which can move the market if he says something unexpected).

    ReplyDelete
  54. Big protests in Bahrain, Libya, Iran, and Algeria - and the markets barrel ahead. Anyone think we'd see a lot more US involvement if these spread to any of the bigger oil producing countries?

    ReplyDelete
  55. Thor,

    As we were talking before, I think Egypt was an outlier in that their Army would not turn on the people. I seriously doubt that these other countries would hesitate to use deadly force if that is what it takes to shut down the protests.

    Especially Iran, obviously. But anything can happen, maybe democracy will be allowed to break out!

    The US is seeing it's own influence wane so not sure if we have enough diplomatic or economic muscle to push our agenda.

    Of course, the US would be overjoyed if Iran had a revolution, but that is a very remote outcome.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Denise - See, I think one or more might fall eventually . . . certainly not Libya, Iran or Syria, but maybe someplace a little less autocratic, like Bahrain or Jordon. . .

    ReplyDelete
  57. @Wolfstreet:

    The W:

    http://www.elbaria.com/uploads/file/UFE%20-%20W%20and%20M%20Pivot%20Power%20Plays.pdf

    http://complacentpanda.blogspot.com/2009/01/w-formation.html
    http://www.fxwords.com/w/w-formation.html
    http://fxanswer.com/anova/answer.php?title=What-s-a-W-formation

    ReplyDelete
  58. In the 50's here! Crazy. Never had such a long warm stretch at this time of year since we moved here. I'm loving it though.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Largest Solar flare in 4 years just ejected. Northern lights as far south as Utah for the next couple nights.

    Greg - any luck?

    ReplyDelete
  60. Are we really at DOUBLE the March 2009 low? Imagine if you'd bought and held. Who wouldn't love a 100% return in three years?

    ReplyDelete
  61. @WolfStreet:

    If you're ever heard the term "higher lows" that is, by definition, a W formation, with the right side of the W higher than the left.

    "Lows" means the lowest pivot point, and since it's plural, there must be 2.

    "Higher lows" means one of the low pivot points must be above the others. Usually we mean that to be the most recent low pivot point is higher than the others.

    What does this mean? It means that for a pivot point to be higher, then enough buyers must raise their buy prices to meet the volume of the sellers that are driving the price lower. It means the buyesr are stronger than the sellers. In "market speak" the bulls are taking charge.

    I've talkes to several traders who only buy W's when the second upleg passes the center of the W. I buy W's when the second upleg turns around and the stochastics start up again, but I set a stop loss just below the left side of the W.

    Now the caveat: if the volume isn't equal or higher on the second pivot point, there's no commitment to the price, and you could see a quick plunge in the opposite direction.

    I posted earlier about volume, and I will put together another post about volume. Volume is really the tell to price action.

    ReplyDelete
  62. There goes TLT. Benny must be speaking?

    ReplyDelete
  63. @Thor: A lot of people did and are feeling great about it (and spending as a result). I wasn't one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I shorted CMG at the end of day yesterday. Take a look, and see if you can see why I did that stupid thing, shorting in this Beach Ball market (thanks, Dss).

    ReplyDelete
  65. Taibbi weighs in via ZH:

    http://www.zerohedge.com/article/matt-taibbis-latest-why-isnt-wall-street-jail

    ReplyDelete
  66. First passage a doozy.....

    Over drinks at a bar on a dreary, snowy night in Washington this past month, a former Senate investigator laughed as he polished off his beer.

    "Everything's fucked up, and nobody goes to jail," he said. "That's your whole story right there. Hell, you don't even have to write the rest of it. Just write that."

    I put down my notebook. "Just that?"

    "That's right," he said, signaling to the waitress for the check. "Everything's fucked up, and nobody goes to jail. You can end the piece right there."

    ReplyDelete
  67. The original thesis that I (and MANY others) held that this was far too big to go even remotely down the rat hole of prosecuting anyone even remotely important proved to be way too daunting a task and would have likely upset the balance too much for the elites to stomach. Peel one layer of the rotten onion and where does it stop? That's always been the issue here.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Manny - couldn't agree more. Good article?

    ReplyDelete
  69. Very good, I think. Check it out. Read the whole thing if you can.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Here's what happened to my TLT. Thanks Benny.

    Fed Says U.S. Economic Growth May Reach 3.9% in 2011

    ReplyDelete
  71. All of this so-called "regulation" (and laws) are for show. It's all one giant theater production with the main actors on both sides laughing all the way to the bank.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Rock (1:15) - Snow is stuff the Fedral Reserve sprinkles around, to blind us to what is really happening.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  73. @Mannwich

    Oops on the timing. Now I know what's snow.

    ReplyDelete
  74. LOL Rock. Thanks for rubbing it in. Again. Feeling like we've turned a major corner this winter though.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Manny - no shit man . . they don't even enforce the damned regulations we already have in place! Adding more for window dressing just to impress the Sheeple is insulting.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Next, addressing the crowd of high-priced lawyers from Wall Street, Bharara made an interesting joke. "I also want to take a moment to applaud the entire staff of the SEC for the really amazing things they have done over the past year," he said. "They've done a real service to the country, to the financial community, and not to mention a lot of your law practices."

    Haw! The line drew snickers from the conference of millionaire lawyers. But the real fireworks came when Khuzami, the SEC's director of enforcement, talked about a new "cooperation initiative" the agency had recently unveiled, in which executives are being offered incentives to report fraud they have witnessed or committed. From now on, Khuzami said, when corporate lawyers like the ones he was addressing want to know if their Wall Street clients are going to be charged by the Justice Department before deciding whether to come forward, all they have to do is ask the SEC.

    "We are going to try to get those individuals answers," Khuzami announced, as to "whether or not there is criminal interest in the case — so that defense counsel can have as much information as possible in deciding whether or not to choose to sign up their client."

    Aguirre, listening in the crowd, couldn't believe Khuzami's brazenness. The SEC's enforcement director was saying, in essence, that firms like Goldman Sachs and AIG and Lehman Brothers will henceforth be able to get the SEC to act as a middleman between them and the Justice Department, negotiating fines as a way out of jail time. Khuzami was basically outlining a four-step system for banks and their executives to buy their way out of prison. "First, the SEC and Wall Street player make an agreement on a fine that the player will pay to the SEC," Aguirre says. "Then the Justice Department commits itself to pass, so that the player knows he's 'safe.' Third, the player pays the SEC — and fourth, the player gets a pass from the Justice Department."

    ReplyDelete
  77. Manny - oooh, absolutely have to read now. As much as it pains me to admit it, I'll have to print it out and read it on my way home from work tonight :-)

    ReplyDelete
  78. They don't even bother to hide this shit anymore. I mean, why bother when they as a group control everything anyway? Who's going to stop them when they're ALL in on it?

    ReplyDelete
  79. More from the article.......

    As for President Obama, what is there to be said? Goldman Sachs was his number-one private campaign contributor. He put a Citigroup executive in charge of his economic transition team, and he just named an executive of JP Morgan Chase, the proud owner of $7.7 million in Chase stock, his new chief of staff. "The betrayal that this represents by Obama to everybody is just — we're not ready to believe it," says Budde, a classmate of the president from their Columbia days. "He's really fucking us over like that? Really? That's really a JP Morgan guy, really?"

    Which is not to say that the Obama era has meant an end to law enforcement. On the contrary: In the past few years, the administration has allocated massive amounts of federal resources to catching wrongdoers — of a certain type. Last year, the government deported 393,000 people, at a cost of $5 billion. Since 2007, felony immigration prosecutions along the Mexican border have surged 77 percent; nonfelony prosecutions by 259 percent. In Ohio last month, a single mother was caught lying about where she lived to put her kids into a better school district; the judge in the case tried to sentence her to 10 days in jail for fraud, declaring that letting her go free would "demean the seriousness" of the offenses.

    So there you have it. Illegal immigrants: 393,000. Lying moms: one. Bankers: zero. The math makes sense only because the politics are so obvious. You want to win elections, you bang on the jailable class. You build prisons and fill them with people for selling dime bags and stealing CD players. But for stealing a billion dollars? For fraud that puts a million people into foreclosure? Pass. It's not a crime. Prison is too harsh. Get them to say they're sorry, and move on. Oh, wait — let's not even make them say they're sorry. That's too mean; let's just give them a piece of paper with a government stamp on it, officially clearing them of the need to apologize, and make them pay a fine instead. But don't make them pay it out of their own pockets, and don't ask them to give back the money they stole. In fact, let them profit from their collective crimes, to the tune of a record $135 billion in pay and benefits last year. What's next? Taxpayer-funded massages for every Wall Street executive guilty of fraud?

    ReplyDelete
  80. You seriously Surprised?February 16, 2011 at 2:46 PM

    Mannwich - You can not be surprised by this, well maybe the depth of it, but seriously this has been going on for years, decades and they only get bolder and bolder.

    Who knows how long it will take for enuff people to realize it, in some ways I wish I did not know, because what can I do about it...NOTHING

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  81. @Mutt: Not surprised, but still pissed to see more and more actual hard proof of it and really no concern at all by those who are in on the gag that we know now. After all, what is anyone going to do about it? Nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  82. True I-Man. Am trying. Doing much better lately.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Sounds like it from your TLT watching... it pays to watch one thing closely.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Manny - one thing I'm really getting from the first part of this Taibi article is that even when there are fines, the people actually responsible for the crimes never pay, it's the shareholders who foot the bill. The criminals are never touched.

    ReplyDelete
  85. @Mannwich

    I think the IRS has to get involved. That's how we got Capone.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Excellent post Rock

    I was thinking about your post on volume then you address that.
    So volume and relative strengh are the main aspects in the W's that you trade?
    Dan

    ReplyDelete
  87. The rule of law is an elastic concept. Always existed privileges but to check how much power a group has is instructive just to check how many times they pass through that process if exist wrongdoing.
    And mainstream media dilute potential outrage in the population if any.
    Dan

    ReplyDelete
  88. True Dan (& Rock), but when things sway too far the other way like they have lately, historically hasn't it been in those times that something came along to tilt things back a bit?

    ReplyDelete
  89. Manny
    Oh definetly. he point to check though is that is an incorporeal concept like uphold the Constitution.
    Very little amounts of people get affectef in a evident way so they can perceive it clearly.
    For the vast majorities even though they could be affected is not noticeable.

    The tipping point is when standards for the vast population get extremely bad.

    If is in a short periiod of time they can suck it up as a "crisis" that they have to weather.

    But if prolonged in time (like stagnant salaries for 10-15 years with healthcare and education going up out of whack) when start affecting shelter and or food then the fuse is lit.

    Here don't see that coming to such a critical point.

    Even though compared to developing nations the standard of living here are going to take a huge blow.
    Blow prepared during the past 35 in the quest for opening new markets overseas.
    From a corporation standpoint is a no brainer trying to make consume good and services to couple billion people in the world rather than 340 millions that are comparing with the rest overstuffed,
    Dan

    ReplyDelete
  90. Here we go. A start, if only a very miniscule one?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/us/17wisconsin.html?hp

    ReplyDelete
  91. Emmie -

    Rick Scott rejects high-speed rail in Florida

    Gov. Rick Scott announced Wednesday morning that he is rejecting $2.4 billion in federal money to build a high speed rail line between Orlando and Tampa.

    In his announcement, Scott criticized federal spending, and worried that Florida would be responsible for cost overruns. He also expressed doubt that governments estimates of three million paying customers a year was accurate.

    The decision is a major setback for advocates of high speed rail in Florida. The project was expected to cost $2.6 billion, with a private contractor kicking in the rest of the money.


    Thanks a bunch! ;-)

    Although I'm not a huge fan of high speed rail, even here in CA.

    ReplyDelete
  92. @Thor

    I'd prefer a local line, personally. Central Florida is terrible for commuting.

    A Orlando-Miami line would be awesome for tourists who want to spend the day in Disney and spend the night (and then some) in Miami. But the beloved governor's red pen on the Tampa line probably makes that a no-go.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Emmie - Yeah, I'm really not sure what our need for one in CA is. I can't envision a ticket on a high speed rail between LA and SF running less than a plane ticket. Plus, why would you take a 3 hour train ride when you can fly, cheaply, for a hundred bucks?

    I dunno, I've always thought the distances between rail stops in the US would make high speed rail less attractive than it is in the EU. Plus, I think I read somewhere that the only high speed rail line in all of Europe that makes a profit is the Channel line between London and Paris.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Thor, sorry I had to step out. I've got the smaller iMac but the 27" looks nice.

    ReplyDelete
  95. Page still goofing up, but I'll play around with it. Will let you know.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Did anyone catch Chris Whalen on Bloomberg this morning? He said that the Wells Fargo CFO quit, walked out, over conflicts in reporting. Whalen said this is extraordinary, given the required attestations due for 2010. He said he didn't know why the CFO left, but he thinks it's only bad news, and changed his outlook on Wells from neutral to negative.
    I listen when Whalen talks. We all know the financial system is precarious, and if you need a reminder, read Denninger's piece (link today on TBP). Whalen is a good canary.
    Kayem

    ReplyDelete
  97. Kayem - I didn't catch that today . . .reading now. . .

    ReplyDelete
  98. Greg - Let me know. You and I are using the same OS and browser so shouldn't be too difficult to figure out.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Kayem -

    NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Wells Fargo(WFC_) is involved in an "ongoing internal dispute" over financial disclosure, prompting the departure of its CFO and leading some officials at the bank to contact regulators over concerns the bank is being too aggressive in its accounting,

    There's a new term for us. Aggressive Accounting. Is this the new PC term for Fraud?

    ReplyDelete
  100. Thor- That's perfect: Aggressive Accounting, on top of Mark-to-Magic, AKA: FRAUD.

    ReplyDelete
  101. I don't know about you guys, but man, sometimes I have NOTHING ready for my posts. Rock, You're a hard act to follow my friend! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  102. Thor,

    Post some photos and call it a day.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Thor,

    You needed on of Italy with the same pose as France. Except the girl needs to be like 12.

    ReplyDelete
  104. Very funny, though.

    We just got back from Wednesday trivia night at the local Irish bar. Only took 2nd place this week. Sometimes we win. We figure our collective age is about 400. Lots of young whippersnappers who are incredibly smart but our advanced ages give us the edge most of the time.

    We actually remember the 70's instead of thinking of it as the time before life began.

    Won $25.00 to be split 8 ways and a shot of something awful.

    ReplyDelete
  105. Congratulations! I love trivia!

    ReplyDelete
  106. It's a lot of fun. We go every other week or once a month.

    ReplyDelete
  107. The VXX had a good day with increased volume.

    The actual VIX has not made a new low since February 8th while the indexes went to new highs.

    S&P down a bit this evening.

    ReplyDelete
  108. @Rock 1:43PM: thks for links and clear details. Yes, I'm aware of the "lower low", "higher high" / "lower high", "lower low" motto. Now I know there's a pattern focusing on the former. Will have to dig further, especially the pdf you linked to.

    ReplyDelete
  109. @Rock 1:43PM:I posted earlier about volume, and I will put together another post about volume. Volume is really the tell to price action.

    I'm relying a lot on volume too. Basically, when trading at pivot or breakout, I consider there's volume confirmation when volume is stronger than average. Applies to a line (support/resistance) and indeed a high or low in a range.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Sometimes I trade key points ahead of any volume confirmation, but get nervous if volume doesn't show up quickly..

    ReplyDelete
  111. In conclusion, looking forward to your post on volume, and being able to discuss it further;)

    ReplyDelete