Pages

Monday, February 27, 2012

Market Forces

Remember the chart I put up that showed we were heading for a 2000 point gain in the DOW (DIA)? And remember the direction change caused by the structural movement of the unified central banks?

That shows the importance of structurals. Anybody trying to time the cycles or count inflection points will be unable to rely on the periodicity of the structural inputs from governments (eg “thou shalt take a bond haircut”) and central banks (eg LTRO’s, TARPs, simultaneous announcements), and the market direction caused by them. That’s why DeMark blew his prediction.

Remember, it’s hard to short a market where the structurals keep popping it higher. That may also be why we see substantially lower volumes, with no one shorting and covering because the overwhelming structural pressure is up.

I decided to look at the SPY from this viewpoint. Here it is:


It’s hard to see, but there’s a black line centered in the ranges, and vertical on a pop to the new range.

As you can see, we operate in a range for a number of days, then Pop to a new range. For the last month or so, we’ve operated in 3 ranges, of 11 days, 9 days and (so far) 6 days. So it appears as though we’re nearing the end of this day-cycle. Looks like a couple more days in this range before we get a pop. Let’s see, what’s happening in a couple of days in the Structurals? Why, the next LTRO, of course.

And we all know why this is happening, right? It’s simply a move by the financial community to take a more firm hold over the actions and direction of governments. Look at Greece: they are ceding their sovereignty in return for money to keep their government jobs. This is an interesting trend. Future governmental financial policy will be contractionary. How will the financial community best make money in that environment? Answer this question correctly, and you will make a lot of money.

So how will I trade this market? Well, as I said, the financial community wants the Bucky to devalue, so I moved a lot of money into the RMB. It’s made me quite a lot since I started this activity. But what about risk assets? As I said above, the market pressure is up. So I will buy dips and sell blips.

But also, I want to look at the depressed sectors. Here are a few charts (weekly) of my herds list that are depressed: Now, I’m not saying these are good investments, and will likely rise. I think we have to answer the above question: how will the financial sector make money in a governmental contractionary environment?

I removed the charts. If anybody wants them back, let me know.

But here's a chart. It's the one I referred to in the top paragraph. It's amazing, we're absolutely on-track.

60 comments:

  1. Well, we recovered our dip. Rock made some money today. Bought the dip. Now selling to wait for a retracement this afternoon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmmmmm.....Bucky's up and so is the market, ahead of the eruo-liquidity.

    I think I'm looking for a stronger dollar tomorrow, and a turn-around tuesday.

    Will see.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Rock - It will be interesting how LTRO effects the market into the next few days.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, Greece is rated by S&P in selective default. Get ready for our buying opportunity.

    There's a couple good articles over at zero hedge to check out. Durable goods down, big miss. Germany funding the LTRO. And the greek thing. I think this mix may cause Mutt's pullback.

    However, be careful, Mutt. A lower market may make the precious metals soar. As you can see from the chart above, SLV could gain 47% without breaking out of its highs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rock - That is what I am waiting for....A pullback, I am to scared and to inexperienced at this point to be trading in this market without a decent pull back, so I guess it is hurry up and wait and study the market.

    I think the LTRO tomorrow will be intersting to watch.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rock - I have not had a chance to head over to ZH this morning, so I do not know if they mentioned the 100% tax write off for certain types of business expantion.

    Which could explain why durables are down.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Mutt: didn't see it over there, and I don't know about it. If you find an article, send the link. Thx

    ReplyDelete
  8. Benny had better print more buckys. Not seeing a housing bottom in these charts...

    http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/02/case-shiller-what-housing-bottom/#comments

    ReplyDelete
  9. There is no bottom yetFebruary 28, 2012 at 12:52 PM

    Mannwich - From how I see things, we have not even gotten close to a bottom in housing (Nationaly) but the talking heads, NAR and banks will continue to spin it like we will start a housing recovery tomorrow.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Mannwich:

    I saw a house Sunday for 600K, bank repo, where the only thing holding it up was the termites were holding hands. The termite report called for $40000 of rework, and only one small section of the house was inspected. The rest is in the same condition.

    The saleslady said that "everything sells". Around here, I'm afraid she's right. But the banks right now are keeping the open inventory low otherwise the bottom would fall out, and the banks sure don't want that to happen.

    So they're keeping the inventory low, and they're putting the dumps on the market. Strategy is good. I heard Case and Schiller on Bloomberg just a few minutes ago, and they agree with both you and Mutt.

    But the banks are trying their best to keep prices up and inventory low. I think the best bargains are yet to come, and hopefully it'll be after some of the cash gets absorbed by these dumps I've been seeing.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Apple's up.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/ibubble-apples-market-cap-now-same-entire-retail-sector-bigger-all-semis

    ReplyDelete
  12. There's a bunch of great articles over on Zerohedge. Additionally, I modified the above post, removed that long list of charts, but added one that's really interesting.

    additionally, Zerohedge alludes to the plunger team, and their current existence. They should get a bonus, don't you think?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Rock - Are you saying a) the plunder....errrr plunger team should be getting a bonus for their fine work or b) ZH, for alluding to the said plunder team?


    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  14. Well, we made it. The E-mini DOW is at 13001 this AM, and the DIA is at 130.00

    Everybody feel good? Been plunged?

    ReplyDelete
  15. FSLR took a hit after hours. I'm buying in on the open and looking for a snap-back. Bucky is up, and premarked is also up, so "will see" who wins.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Rock - If it is true that there is an actual and real plunger team, it would seem to make sence that the longer and farther they keep the market supported, the longer and harder the market will fall.

    How much plunging can this market take....I still did not get my pull back and it does not look like I will for awhile.

    So on the side line I sit.

    Mangy Mutt

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think the market will fall hard. Remember tons of liquidity have been pumped in to the system, and if there is a fall, that liquidity will immediately be pumped in. You'll never see a Lehman event cause a move to 666 again.

      If there is a pullback, at all, it will be no more than 5%, when huge sideline liquidity will enter the market.

      Sorry to burst your bubble.

      Delete
    2. Rock - Thanks and I have a pretty good grasp of what you are saying, I was not looking for a crash, but was looking for a decent pull back, to let everything re-align it's self.

      The charts and patterns that I have been working with suggested we were due (Actually the way I saw them -Over due) for a pull back at which point I wanted to enter a couple possition.

      But I was also taking into effect the LTRO and figured that might help keep things on an slow upward grind and saddly ALL my work was done under the pretence of a pull back and I had no plan in place for what is currently going on.

      So I grab a soda and some popcorn, re-evaluate my thinking and see what developes.

      I wish I was in, but the fact of the matter is I still get to learn and even though that knowledge is not currently making me any money, hopefully some day it will.

      Mutt

      Delete
  17. I agree, Rock. Banks are artificially keeping supply lower than it normally would be because they aren't being forced to write down the losses if they just sit on the inventory. This could go on for a decade (or more), I'm afraid, and will only serve to dampen the economy during that time. It's a different shade of Japan all over again. Banks (not the Sheeple) must be protected at all times. The O man cast his lot there and it's too late to turn back. He's more than all-in with the banks at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  18. It's the Benny Put, the Put to end ALL Puts! I've been saying this since '09. The fallout from this whenever it happens is going to be make the last two bubble collapses look miniature. It's not a real "market" anymore (maybe it never really was one), and maybe hasn't since Greenie's Put told Wall Street he'd do whatever he could to keep the game going following the '87 crash.

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Mutt:

    The plunger team used to be involved in bank trading. The rumor was that in the market after hours the plunger team would call up the guys with big active trading desks and tell them to borrow at 0% and buy specific equities. This would cause a move (after hours trading volume is quite low)and we commoners would see that pop in the AM.

    They can't do that anymore. No more prop trading.

    To get around that, now they use repos to move the market. So now you have to check the credit market. That's not very visible to us common people, so we have to use CDS as a kind of proxy. Bloomberg has many of the important CDS's on their website. I use

    http://www.distressedvolatility.com/2010/07/nice-to-see-cds-quotes-credit-default.html

    as my list, they have more than enough for me. I would love to see some index for these, but I wouldn't have a clue how to get that.

    The other thing that moves the market is press releases. If the plungers need to, they can get the big players to work for them and coordinate a press release. For example, remember the (after hours) announcement that the central banks would support the Euro? Like that. The press release was meaningless (or a statement of the obvious) but remember the BIG move it made in the market?

    You can get info on structured products at the FINRA website:

    http://www.finra.org/Industry/Compliance/MarketTransparency/TRACE/StructuredProduct/

    It takes a lot of time to research this info and compile it so that you can see trends. I don't have the resources (no time left in a day) so I can't do it. I haven't found anybody's blog doing it either. We used to have a bond guy, but he's gone. We never had a CDS guy.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Mannwich:

    The government is involved in over 90% of all mortgages now.

    That's one reason the market's so tight. Banks aren't lending. I just did a refi on my house to take advantage of another 1/2 point because I'm owner-occupied again. (They charge more interest on an investment property).

    So I applied Dec/E, and it's just now come back from the underwriters (nice way of saying Fannie). My bankster told me that Wells won't be owning my mortgages anymore. (I'm signing this afternoon at 3:00)

    Laurie Goodman was just on Bloomberg. She's amazing. Here are some of her datapoints:
    1. There's 2.8 million mortgages that haven't had a single payment in a year.
    2. There's a total of 3.2 million homes in shadow inventory (the 2.8 + 470K foreclosed on the market).
    3. Homes have never been cheaper to own, over history, adjusted for inflation.
    4. Banksters aren't loaning. You can't get a 30 year loan with 20% down, regardless of your employment status.
    5. We are amortizing the 3.2 million homes at a 90K/month rate. Do the math: that's a 3 year (36 month) inventory.
    6. Homes aren't being offered to individual investors.
    7. Mortgages will be packaged by Freddie and Fanny in 200-300 property tranches and sold in bulk to private equity firms, who will rent them out.
    8. People aren't buying homes: They are waiting, for no good reason (fear itself)
    9. Rents will go up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 3,200,000 * 90,000 * 36 = 10,368,000,000,000.07

      Well 90,000*36 = 3,240,000

      So basically we are multiplying 3.2 million by 3.2 million which comes out to a great big number.

      I do not know if the current policies were put into place by design or has just manifested themselves out of the given conditions, but this does not set well for the middle or lower class.

      Rock - Was saving .5% worth the effort? If you are at or about 5% already a .5% difference normally doesn't offer much savings.

      Also we have found out that 15 and 30 fixed are next to impossible to get.

      Just curious.

      Mutt

      Delete
    2. For me it was. Because that money is in RMB, where every few basis points really counts.

      It's called the carry trade.

      Basically, it's making money for free. And it's return is better than a bond, I'm about 2% profitable, and will be 2.5% profitable after the re-fi (and Wells ate the fees because they want to sell to Freddie and this gives them the opportunity). That's free money, insured by the governments of China and the US.

      And if China lets the RMB float, I'm likely to realize another who knows how many percents.

      Delete
    3. I don't exactly understand your math. But anyway, if the 2.8M homes are removed from the market quickly by the private equity investment, home prices will be on the rise again. The PE people won't be able to sell for some years, so the middle class who's been paying for their homes will see the value go up.

      And the 2.8 million families will have to pay rent, because it's easier to throw out a renter for non-payment than it is to foreclose. And deemed less-evil by society. So all that rental money will enter back into the market (or stay in the coffers of the PE people).

      It could end up being a good positive for the middle class homeowners who are paying their bills.

      Delete
  21. I forgot another datapoint? She says that home values will drop another 5% in 2012, and based on the rate of fall, we are near the bottom. (remember Case-Schiller said home prices will fall 10% in 2012).

    One other datapoint, the latest job revisions have adjusted salaries upward for the last 2 months. There's a bigger income base.

    And one other trading comment I have; When the government sells off those tranches of mortgages, you're going to see a whole bunch of money spent on contractors (jobs numbers will go up dramatically) to get those homes ready for rent. This is a good way to get some of that sideline money back into the markets again.

    It just won't help me because I can't buy a 300 tranche of homes.

    But I can buy HD, and Lowe's and maybe Mohawk stocks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wish I could believeFebruary 29, 2012 at 1:55 PM

      Rock - I wish I could believe the people talking up a housing bottom.

      By no means am I an expert on the subject and I do not want to sound pesimistic, only realistic, but from how I see things (Babyboomers trying to unload their McMansion and vacation homes, the Mannwich's and Thor's of the world already owning, and the college kids with huge student loan debt) I do not believe 10% lower is enuff nor do I think we will be at the actual bottom until about 2015 and even at that the bottom will be a long and bumpy ride.

      Just my to pennies.

      Mutt

      Delete
    2. This boomer has his houses in his will. Each kid gets one (my worthless son already took his). (It was a good thing for him, BTW, I think he's for sure a better renter than homeowner). I know they'll never be able to afford one, and even though homeownership isn't for all of us, I think it will give them a foundation necessary to leverage their lives in a positive direction.

      Now, all I have to do is die.....

      Delete
    3. The one scary thing is that some percentage of the 2.8 million homes may have unemployed owners. The unemployment insurance is usually not nearly enough to pay for a mortgage. So if the private equity takes these homes, and kicks the people out (they probably can't pass the employment section of a rental application), there's going to be some hard times ahead.

      Delete
    4. Very good view point, I also believe there are going to be some very hard times ahead for everyone, but I also believe those who have been able to anticpate things like a true housing crisis will be in a much better position to recover and move ahead.

      Mutt

      Delete
  22. @Mannwich:

    Banks can't afford to take the losses; their balance sheets would effectively be "marked to market", which would make them immediately insolvent. Also don't forget that these mortgages have been rated AAA and repo'ed. (we all now know what repo means, right?) So if they were all sold off at a big loss, that would create a credit event triggering all those CDS's. What happens next is anybody's guess. I certainly don't pretend to know.

    QE3 will undoubtedly buy the troubled MBS from the banks, which would put the losses on the public sector, rather than the private sector. This is why you'll see QE3. We don't need more liquidity. The Fed already owns some MBS's, you'll see them own more. But they don't have a policy (yet) to sell tranches or entire MBS's to private equity. Remember MBS's were structured with all types of properties: commercial, rental, single-family.

    I'm afraid this whole thing is bigger than Obama, or any president. A president didn't create this mess, and a president can't fix it. The people who created this can't fix it either. The only alternative is to kick the can down the road (as Europe did last night).

    And you know the names of the individuals who created this, right? They are named Greed and OverLeverage. And they are us.

    Which is why I'm not completely against moving this mess to the public sector.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rock - I am no fan of Obummer, but I 100% agree with you, he did not creat this mess (I believe Ronny was helpful in getting this ball rolling) and he can not clean it up, but I still don't care for him.

      That is why this year I am voting the NEWT/PALIN ticket.

      *I hope Thor does not read that BAHAHAHAHAHAHA*

      Mutt

      Delete
    2. I'll put up another post to hide your reply....

      Delete
    3. I agree, Rock, but I don't see any "shared sacrifice" in these policies. Those at the very top aren't sacrificing anything (again), and those are the very people who mostly led us to this point. Life sucks sometimes, doesn't it?

      Delete
    4. Yep. Yep. Life sucks. Then you die.

      Delete
  23. @Rock: your 9:32

    You meant that as CDS's increase in price, the cost of credit has increased in price, making the market go down, right?

    Yep, yep. that's what I meant. Yep.

    ReplyDelete
  24. @Mutt:

    You might want to look at the weekly chart of AGQ. At this moment, it's pulled back, and looks like it's pressure is up.

    ReplyDelete
  25. CA attorney general today proposed a homeowner "bill of rights" where anyone renting a property that has been foreclosed upon can't have eviction proceedings started for 3 months.

    In other words, a person can put his deposit down and the first month's rent, and live free for 2 months. We landlords are already prevented from holding the deposit in lieu of rent.

    So, not only must investors pay 1% higher mortgage rates, they must also eat 3 months' deadbeat costs (it takes 30 days to evict for nonpayment of rent).

    ReplyDelete
  26. My [rant] and [/rant] got stripped, I used "<" and ">", Should have learned by now, you think?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Take a look at the 3 minute chart of SHLD for yesterday, right at the end of the day, and you'll see HVT at work. There was a huge trade placed at 15:57 of 10 times the average volume. As you'd expect, the buy ate out all the stops, showed a significant price rise, so the bot tried another buy of 20X average volume, ate out more stops and popped the price to 68.95, then a minute later bought 40X volume and the price popped to 70. The other bots following SHLD moved their stops, and at 16:00, a sell order came in of over 80X average volume, and because the bots had moved so many buy orders, the price only dropped to 69.26.

    So somebody wanted out of SHLD. They used a bot who sensed where the buy and sell orders were, moved the stock up 3$ and took the profits.

    Now, this AM, I expect SHLD to fall back below it's original price of 67.40, so it's a good short risk/reward.

    Anyway, this is something you and I can't do. How HVT traders have the advantage.

    ReplyDelete
  28. And the bot companies who got burned on this one will undoubtedly adjust their buy move algorithm to account for huge orders.

    And some poor mathematicians just got fired.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Well, UUP continues in its downchannel today, no breakout to the upside. I guess the effect of the LTRO is over. Somebody said on Bloomberg that there could be a delayed reaction, but I doubt it.

    US treasury CDS is flat today, and only 2.50 above the 52 week low. Market's up.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Taibbi does "teach-in" at Bryant Park. Puts it all in layman's terms. It's a sheer miracle that people literally don't care about this while caring about welfare for the poor, the immigrant issue and other minor items by comparison. The "low hanging fruit" theory. A nation of kick-down, kiss-up types afflicted with Stockholm Syndrome. What a strange, bizarre time period we are living through. Can't believe the last 10-12 years have even happened sometimes....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17g9v0lPxgs

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Mannwich:

    Here's a good read. It shows the size of the exposure.

    http://www.housingwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Laurie-Goodman-Testimony-09202011.pdf

    I was actually looking at properties, but after thinking about this, I think it's not appropriate to invest in another one until the government sets the values in conjunction with Fannie and Freddie and the banksters.

    My feeling is that the government won't let the values fall very much farther, because of the effect it will have on the banks' balance sheets, and as you say, we have to save the banks at all costs. So I'm guessing Laurie Goodman is right.

    One alternative is for QE3 to buy lots of mortgages or clumps of the MBS. The problem with MBS is they're all jumbled up in lots of configurations, and to unravel those will be difficult at best. So it's probably better for the Fed to simply print the money and give it to the banks in return for the mortgage paper. Um if they can find it, that is......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Didn't Fannie just ask for another cool $4B or so the other day to cover even more losses? This shit could go on for years. What an epic mess. Mostly made by the very people who are still paying no price now. Wish George Carlin were alive. He'd have a field day with this crap.

      Delete
  32. Bizarro world goes on. Extend and pretend is now the official policy of the world.

    http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/03/isda-suckers-wanted/#comments

    ReplyDelete
  33. @Mannwich:

    The CDS is a legal document.

    You know, I went to college thinking I might want to become a lawyer. This wordsmithing will make a lot lot lot of money for lawyers.

    I read an article the other day about who you would sue if a CDS came due, and the payment was not paid. I wish I could find that article again.

    I think any jury anywhere would clearly identify this as a default. It is what I was expecting, and why most of my powder is dry. Let the market tank so I can buy in.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Mannwich:

    "Epic mess."

    Ulyssessian. For sure.

    Good terminology.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Bucky's up, but still inside its downchannel. For some reason, Bloomberg's pulled down their CDS quote system, so I can no longer see the CDS. It's probably up today. Opening with a pop down, but I'm buying the dip, looking for a move northward.

    "Will see".

    ReplyDelete
  36. Still no reserve requirements for CDS? Let's just keep doing the wrong things over and over and over again. And hope for the best.

    http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/03/credit-default-swaps-cds-are-insurance-products-not-tradeable-assets/#comments

    ReplyDelete
  37. Bucky's got a lot of trading volume this AM. Headed up. Looks like a move into strength today. I bought some VXX at 24.05, I think if bucky proves true, we'll see the trin go up and volatility rise..

    @Mannwich:
    CDS is simply a way of looking at credit risk. I think CDS are not bought from places that everybody knows can't pay out. Which is why I'm quite surprised a 50% defalut didn't cause them to be activated. That immediately lowered the value of a CDS by 1/2, or made them 2X more expensive to buy.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think all CDS' should be banned. I really do. Derivatives like these are the ticking time bomb of the market that still hasn't been resolved. Should be able to take insurance on your own investments only (not other peoples' "houses") and the counterparty needs to be capitalized accordingly, meaning stop paying gigantic bonuses to clowns and criminals who are often taking them based on fictitious profits proven later to be losses.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Volume is very light this AM. But, Bloomberg had a guy on last nite who talked about the shadow exchanges. All we can see is the NYSE and NASDAQ, but the bulk of the shares are trading off-site.

    That may be why there's such huge price moves overnight, when the accumulated prices from off-site are plugged in.

    That's the ohly sense I can make of it.

    If anybody knowsw how to get visib ility into these off-site exchanges, put up the info here, please.

    ReplyDelete
  40. @Mannwich:

    I never bought life insurance, either. Same reason. But life insurance does have some statistics backing it up.....

    ReplyDelete
  41. Off Site ExchangesMarch 2, 2012 at 10:42 AM

    Rock - I have wondered why there can be such big moves and been curious if there was something like an "offsite" way of trading.

    I am not sure if it is true, as that would add one more layer of manipulation to the system and make it that much more difficult for the not connected to get a fair shake and we all know TPTB want everyone on a level playing field.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  42. Fund flows very very positive this year. See

    http://etf-ia.com/sites/all/themes/etfia/downloads/Jan-2012-ETF-Data-Net-Flows.pdf

    January was almost double December. Will be interested to see February's number. Remember the fund guys are paid to be in, not paid to have cash on the sidelines.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Hmmmm OTher BusinessesMarch 2, 2012 at 12:13 PM

    Rock - I can think of another business were payment to be in is being made and no payment for being out.

    Mutt

    ReplyDelete
  44. A new post is available. This one's for you and me, Mutt.

    ReplyDelete